Originally posted by Craizie
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Test drove a 2014 Camaro SS!
Collapse
X
-
I begged with him to just test drive one so it would make up his mind for him and then he could somehow convince her but nope. And he takes shits when he pleases. She butts in on big purchases.2004 Mustang GT: BBK shorty headers, BBK O/R X, Flowmaster catback, JLT cold air, Trickflow 75mm TB and Plenum, UD pulleys, upper and lower CA's, 3.73, SCT XCal 2 ---- SOLD
Comment
-
Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostChallengers are great looking cars but are SLOW unless they are one of the new 6.4 SRT8s, and again I don't care for the interiors.HD Parts
paul@maverickhd.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by 89stangGT View Postwait. when did this happen? Last I heard they had a 6.1 and then moved to a 6.2. where'd the 6.4 come from? still slow.
I test drove a couple of Plum Purple 2010 SRT8s (only year they were made) and I just could not get past the fact they were way slower and way more expensive than the Mustang GT. The 6.4s run much better - they are consistently 12-second cars. But they're still crazy expensive.
That white one is badass!!When the government pays, the government controls.
Comment
-
I really love the Challengers, but like Danny, I just don't get why they made them so overweight. The Camaro and 5.0 have 4.3 second 0-60 times, and the even the SRT8 is slower. I really like all 3 of them. It feels like the late 90's again, though Muscle Cars don't seem to be nearly as prevalent and popular as they were back then. I've gotten some dirty looks from Portland looking hippies as I blow buy their precious little savetheplanetmobiles.
Comment
Comment