Pretty sure any patent that has their wits about them can refuse treatment. If not they have to be declared legally incompetent and a power of atty or conservatorship has to be issued. My father had a DNR in his trust, but ultimately it was my decision.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Awkward conversation last night
Collapse
X
-
That's one of the most difficult things to deal with in medicine. Have to watch a patient go through the stages of death and dying and not be able to do anything due to the patient and/or family's wishes. I respect their decisions, but it's still difficult to watch.
As far as internal bleeding and not doing anything about it...I would have to hear the circumstances to understand that decision. But some patients will not survive surgery so why put them through the painful process? If a patient has the triad of death (acidosis, coagulopathy and hypothermia) then surgery will kill them 100% of the time. I'm not sure of this patient's situation, but there has to be a reason to not intervene with an actively bleeding patient. DNR does not mean Do Not Treat...it just means that if they go into cardiac arrest, that resuscitation efforts are not instituted. But until that point, most anything is fair game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by davbrucas View PostLoL...most of my patients laugh at morphine. They want demerol.Originally posted by lincolnboyAfter watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GeorgeG. View PostInternal bleeding for 2 hours?...why couldn't y'all fix him up?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gonzo View Postive seen one with whats called esophageal varicies which are basically ulcers in the esophagus that rupture and bleed. sometimes there are too many of them to stop. they are usually caused by alcohol abuse. alcoholism is a hell of a drug
Comment
Comment