Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It's useless science Friday in my head - Welcome to the show.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 46Tbird
    replied
    Some raindrops travel faster than they should, say scientists who suggest the superterminal drops may mess with rainfall estimates.


    Some Racing Raindrops Break Their 'Speed Limit'

    Some radical raindrops are flouting the rules: The wet-weather drips seem to be breaking a physical speed limit, sometimes falling 10 times faster than they should, scientists have found.

    Like all objects in free fall, raindrops move according to the laws of physics. One of those laws puts a barrier on how fast a free-falling object can travel. This terminal velocity is reached when the downward tug of gravity equals the opposing force of air resistance.

    In 2009, physicists reported that they had discovered small raindrops falling faster than this terminal velocity. In that study, detailed in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, Alexander Kostinski and Raymond Shaw of Michigan Technological University, along with Guillermo Montero-Martinez and Fernando Garcia-Garcia of the National University of Mexico, measured 64,000 raindrops, and found clusters of "superterminal" drops falling faster than they should based on their size and weight, especially as the rain became heavier.

    In the new study, Kostinski and his colleagues verified that initial finding using completely different instruments. The researchers clocked the speeds of 1.5 million raindrops passing through a laser beam during six rainstorms at a site near Charleston, South Carolina. All of the raindrops measuring 0.8 millimeters (0.03 inches) and larger fell to the ground at predicted speeds, but 30 to 60 percent of the smaller drops (those measuring about 0.3 millimeters, or about 0.01 inches) traveled faster than their terminal velocity.

    "Occasionally, smaller drops (less than a millimeter) fall more than 10 times faster than expected," Kostinski told Live Science in an email. "On average, small drops move about 30 percent faster than expected, but it depends on rain type and strength."

    The superterminal drops may be the result of fragmenting, in which a "parent" droplet breaks up into smaller droplets. "Right after the breakup, fragments move approximately with the speed of mother drops," Kostinski wrote. "The mother drop is large, and its terminal speed is much higher than the one of smaller drops. This is one possible reason for smaller drops (fragments), breaking the speed limit."

    So-called turbulent wakes that form behind the raindrops may also explain the odd behavior. In those wakes, air resistance that's opposing gravity's downward pull would decrease. "If they fall behind another drop, air drag decreases (like a group of bikers behind a leader)," Kostinski wrote.

    By using 21 laser precipitation monitors and a video device, the researchers also ruled out the idea that the speedy raindrops were the result of droplets splashing off the instruments or some kind of measurement error.

    "The fact that a substantial fraction of drizzle-sized drops are moving faster than their terminal velocities suggest that we are not just seeing an outlier effect here," lead author Michael Larsen, an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at the College of Charleston, said in a statement. "That was a bit surprising to me and helped me realize that there's more science to be done."

    The researchers aren't sure what is causing some raindrops to plummet to Earth so fast. "We did not predict this, to be honest," Kostinski said. However, the finding may impact rainfall estimates and erosion calculations based on models that use assumed speeds of all raindrops. (Faster-moving raindrops have more kinetic energy to erode the soils they hit.)

    "The assumption that rain consists of single, isolated drops, falling at prescribed speeds, has lasted so long [in atmospheric science]," Kostinski said in the statement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Strychnine
    replied
    Free knowledge, in video format


    Scale of the Universe


    Scale of the small and large

    We humans have trouble comprehending something larger than, say, our planet (and even that isn't easy to conceptualize) and smaller than, say, a cell (once again, still not easy to think about). This tutorial explores the scales of the universe well beyond that of normal human comprehension, but does so in a way that makes them at least a little more understandable. How does a bacteria compare to an atom? What about a galaxy to a star? Turn on your inertial dampeners. You're in store for quite a ride!

    Scale of the large
    Scale of the small

    Light and fundamental forces

    This tutorial gives an overview of light and the fundamental four forces. You won't have a degree in physics after this, but it'll give you some good context for understanding cosmology and the universe we are experiencing. It should be pretty understandable by someone with a very basic background in science.

    Introduction to light
    Four fundamental forces

    Scale of earth, sun, galaxy and universe

    The Earth is huge, but it is tiny compared to the Sun (which is super huge). But the Sun is tiny compared to the solar system which is tiny compared to the distance to the next star. Oh, did we mention that there are over 100 billion stars in our galaxy (which is about 100,000 light years in diameter) which is one of hundreds of billions of galaxies in just the observable universe (which might be infinite for all we know). Don't feel small. We find it liberating. Your everyday human stresses are nothing compared to this enormity that we are a part of. Enjoy the fact that we get to be part of this vastness!

    Scale of earth and sun
    Scale of solar system
    Scale of distance to closest stars
    Scale of the galaxy
    Intergalactic scale
    Hubble image of galaxies

    Time scale of the cosmos

    Not only is the universe unimaginable large (possibly infinite), but it is also unimaginably old. If you were feeling small in space, wait until you realize that all of human history is but a tiny blip in the history of the universe.

    Cosmological time scale 1
    Cosmological time scale 2

    Big bang and expansion of the universe

    What does it mean for the universe to expand? Was the "big bang" an explosion of some sort or a rapid expansion of space-time (it was the latter)? If the universe was/is expanding, what is "outside" it? How do we know how far/old things are? This tutorial addresses some of the oldest questions known to man.

    Big bang introduction
    Radius of observable universe
    Radius of observable universe (correction)
    Red shift
    Cosmic background radiation
    Cosmic background radiation 2
    Hubble's law
    A universe smaller than the observable

    Leave a comment:


  • Gtracer
    replied
    100 petabytes...damn, I can't even do the math...lol

    How many 0's in 1 quadrillion? Haha

    Leave a comment:


  • krazy kris
    replied
    Damn apple juice

    Leave a comment:


  • Strychnine
    replied
    Jimmy I'm only like 15 min into that video. This might take a while to get through!

    Leave a comment:


  • GeorgeG.
    replied
    mind. blown.

    Leave a comment:


  • Strychnine
    replied
    The LHC will be running again soon

    CERN's two-year shutdown drawing to a close

    It's almost two years to the day since the team in the CERN Control Centre switched off the beams in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at 7.24am on 14 February 2013, marking the end of the accelerator's first three-year run. Hundreds of engineers and technicians have been repairing and strengthening the laboratory's accelerators and experiments in preparation for running the LHC at the higher energy. So what has the work achieved?

    When the LHC restarts this year, the energy of particle collisions will be 13 TeV (or 6.5 TeV per beam) compared to 8 TeV (4 TeV per beam) in 2012. This higher energy will allow physicists to extend their searches for new particles and to check previously untestable theories.

    To prepare the machine for this new energy frontier, 18 of the LHC's 1232 superconducting dipole magnets, which steer particle beams around the accelerator, were replaced due to wear and tear. More than 10,000 electrical interconnections between dipole magnets were fitted with splices – pieces of metal that act as an alternative path for the 11,000 amp current, saving the interconnection if there is a fault. The machine will operate at a higher voltage to run the higher energy beams, and has been fitted with new sets of radiation-resistant electronics. The vacuum system that keeps the beam pipe clear of stray molecules has been upgraded, and the cryogenics system for the LHC's superconducting dipole magnets has been refurbished.

    Bunches of protons in the accelerator will be separated in time by 25 nanoseconds compared to 50 nanoseconds. The LHC will thus deliver more particles per unit time, as well as more collisions, to the experiments. To prepare for the challenges of more collisions, the LHC experiments, including ALICE, ATLAS, CMS and LHCb, underwent full consolidation and maintenance programmes, including upgrades to their subdetectors and data-acquisition systems.

    The CERN IT department purchased and installed almost 60,000 new cores and over 100 petabytes of additional disk storage to cope with the increased amount of data that is expected from the experiments during run 2. Significant upgrades have also been made to the networking infrastructure, including the installation of new uninterruptible power supplies.

    When the LHC starts up again this spring, CERN's accelerators and experiments will be ready.
    It's almost two years to the day since the team in the CERN Control Centre switched off the beams in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at 7.24am on 14 February 2013, marking the end of the accelerator's first three-year run. Hundreds of engineers and technicians have been repairing and strengthening the laboratory's accelerators and experiments in preparation for running the LHC at the higher energy. So what has the work achieved?

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Tyrone Biggums View Post
    I wasn't real interested in the sacred geometry part of the conversation. If one looks long and hard enough, they could probably throw in whatever numbers they want and make them work to fit their ideas. What I found the most intriguing were the ideas behind earth change and cosmic events. The ice core samples, floods, cosmic impacts, the idea that a civilization with notable advancement, no so unlike our own, could have existed and been completely wiped out without traces to be found(yet), etc.
    The likelihood is low.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tyrone Biggums
    replied
    Originally posted by YALE View Post
    The long and the short of my problem with sacred geometry is the insistence on it being sacred. If it were real, it would just be geometry.

    Sacred geometry:geometry as alternative medicine:medicine
    I wasn't real interested in the sacred geometry part of the conversation. If one looks long and hard enough, they could probably throw in whatever numbers they want and make them work to fit their ideas. What I found the most intriguing were the ideas behind earth change and cosmic events. The ice core samples, floods, cosmic impacts, the idea that a civilization with notable advancement, no so unlike our own, could have existed and been completely wiped out without traces to be found(yet), etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Tyrone Biggums View Post
    Which concepts did you feel were the most bullshit laden? Not picking an argument, just want to know what others took from the conversation.
    The long and the short of my problem with sacred geometry is the insistence on it being sacred. If it were real, it would just be geometry.

    Sacred geometry:geometry as alternative medicine:medicine

    Leave a comment:


  • Tyrone Biggums
    replied
    Originally posted by YALE View Post
    It's for sure bullshit.
    Which concepts did you feel were the most bullshit laden? Not picking an argument, just want to know what others took from the conversation.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    It's for sure bullshit.

    Leave a comment:


  • cobrajet69
    replied
    Originally posted by Snatch Napkin View Post
    Fuck...

    That's heavy.
    Yes, yes it is.




    David

    Leave a comment:


  • Snatch Napkin
    replied
    Originally posted by Tyrone Biggums View Post
    I've spent the last few commutes listening to a JRE podcast with Randall Carlson and it's been, by far, one of the most thought provoking things I've listened to lately. I wanted to share and think this may be the best place for it.

    "Randall Carlson is a master builder and architectural designer, teacher, geometrician, geomythologist, geological explorer and renegade scholar. He has 4 decades of study, research and exploration into the interface between ancient mysteries and modern science, has been an active Freemason for 30 years and is Past Master of one of the oldest and largest Masonic lodges in Georgia. He has been recognized by The National Science Teachers Association for his commitment to Science education for young people."

    DISCLAIMER: The video is 3 hours long AND I have not yet watched it but can't get to it fast enough because I really want to see the graphs and pictures Carlson talks about. In addition, I know nothing about Mr. Carlson other than what I've heard in this single podcast and am in no position to make any claims to the validity or invalidity of what he's saying. It's rare that I'm inclined to share anything and this is only here because I found it very interesting and thought it would make for some decent conversation amongst those who take interest in science and our planet. I look forward to seeing what others think.

    Fuck...

    That's heavy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tremor14
    replied
    Originally posted by rick modena View Post
    ...
    thats trippy

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X