Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

World changing technology enables crops to take nitrogen from the air

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • World changing technology enables crops to take nitrogen from the air

    I'm sure most people have no idea exactly how much the world was changed when the Haber-Bosch process was invented which allowed man to created nitrogen based fertilizers from the air instead of having to collect and process nitrates (generally from Peru and Chile back then in the early 1900s).

    If you're interested you should grab a copy of [ame="http://www.amazon.com/The-Alchemy-Air-Scientific-Discovery/dp/030735179"]The Alchemy of Air[/ame] and read how their process not only led to the ability to more mass produce food and won them a Nobel Prize in 1931 but also the ability to mass produce weapons (gunpowder).

    It has been said that "their work effectively removed the primary limiting factor that kept human populations in check." and it is estimated that 1/2 of the world's population today would not be here if it were not for synthetic nitrogen (due to crop yield limitations)



    But, synthetic nitrogen has its downfalls

    Nitrogen oxides contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, or smog, which increases the risk of serious respiratory illness and cancer; a different problem arises in the stratosphere, where these gases destroy beneficial UV-blocking ozone. Nitrogen fertilizers also stimulate natural bacteria to produce more nitrous oxide, which contributes to acid rain and is a greenhouse gas that traps 300 times more heat per molecule than does carbon dioxide. Reactive nitrogen infiltrates surface streams and groundwater, polluting drinking wells. Excess levels of nitrogen in some ecosystems bolsters some species at the expense of others, leading to overall reduced biodiversity.

    Perhaps the most visible impacts are the huge “dead zones” in the Baltic Sea and other areas downstream from farms. One of the worst is in the Gulf of Mexico, where fertilizer runoff carried by the Mississippi River feeds huge algae blooms that deprive other organisms of oxygen. The zone changes in size depending on the flow volume of the river and other seasonal factors. Last year it was about 6,700 square miles—larger than Connecticut.

    Our use of synthetic nitrogen is head-scratchingly inefficient: One study found that for every 100 grams of synthetic nitrogen used in agriculture in 2005, only 17 grams found their way into crops or animal products consumed by humans


    Anyway, man has one-upped himself yet again and given power back to the the environment (with a little help).



    A major new technology has been developed by The University of Nottingham, which enables all of the world's crops to take nitrogen from the air rather than expensive and environmentally damaging fertilisers.

    World changing technology enables crops to take nitrogen from the air

    July 25, 2013


    A major new technology has been developed by The University of Nottingham, which enables all of the world's crops to take nitrogen from the air rather than expensive and environmentally damaging fertilisers.

    Nitrogen fixation, the process by which nitrogen is converted to ammonia, is vital for plants to survive and grow. However, only a very small number of plants, most notably legumes (such as peas, beans and lentils) have the ability to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere with the help of nitrogen fixing bacteria. The vast majority of plants have to obtain nitrogen from the soil, and for most crops currently being grown across the world, this also means a reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertiliser.

    Professor Edward Cocking, Director of The University of Nottingham's Centre for Crop Nitrogen Fixation, has developed a unique method of putting nitrogen-fixing bacteria into the cells of plant roots. His major breakthrough came when he found a specific strain of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in sugar-cane which he discovered could intracellularly colonise all major crop plants. This ground-breaking development potentially provides every cell in the plant with the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. The implications for agriculture are enormous as this new technology can provide much of the plant's nitrogen needs.

    A leading world expert in nitrogen and plant science, Professor Cocking has long recognised that there is a critical need to reduce nitrogen pollution caused by nitrogen based fertilisers. Nitrate pollution is a major problem as is also the pollution of the atmosphere by ammonia and oxides of nitrogen.

    In addition, nitrate pollution is a health hazard and also causes oxygen-depleted 'dead zones' in our waterways and oceans. A recent study estimates that that the annual cost of damage caused by nitrogen pollution across Europe is £60 billion—£280 billion a year.1

    Speaking about the technology, which is known as 'N-Fix', Professor Cocking said: "Helping plants to naturally obtain the nitrogen they need is a key aspect of World Food Security. The world needs to unhook itself from its ever increasing reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertilisers produced from fossil fuels with its high economic costs, its pollution of the environment and its high energy costs."

    N-Fix is neither genetic modification nor bio-engineering. It is a naturally occurring nitrogen fixing bacteria which takes up and uses nitrogen from the air. Applied to the cells of plants (intra-cellular) via the seed, it provides every cell in the plant with the ability to fix nitrogen. Plant seeds are coated with these bacteria in order to create a symbiotic, mutually beneficial relationship and naturally produce nitrogen.

    N-Fix is a natural nitrogen seed coating that provides a sustainable solution to fertiliser overuse and Nitrogen pollution. It is environmentally friendly and can be applied to all crops. Over the last 10 years, The University of Nottingham has conducted a series of extensive research programmes which have established proof of principal of the technology in the laboratory, growth rooms and glasshouses.

    The University of Nottingham's Plant and Crop Sciences Division is internationally acclaimed as a centre for fundamental and applied research, underpinning its understanding of agriculture, food production and quality, and the natural environment. It also has one of the largest communities of plant scientists in the UK.

    Dr Susan Huxtable, Director of Intellectual Property Commercialisation at The University of Nottingham, believes that the N-Fix technology has significant implications for agriculture, she said: "There is a substantial global market for the N-Fix technology, as it can be applied globally to all crops. N-Fix has the power to transform agriculture, while at the same time offering a significant cost benefit to the grower through the savings that they will make in the reduced costs of fertilisers. It is a great example of how University research can have a world-changing impact."

    The N-Fix technology has been licensed by The University of Nottingham to Azotic Technologies Ltd to develop and commercialise N-Fix globally on its behalf for all crop species.

    Peter Blezard, CEO of Azotic Technologies added: "Agriculture has to change and N-Fix can make a real and positive contribution to that change. It has enormous potential to help feed more people in many of the poorer parts of the world, while at the same time, dramatically reducing the amount of synthetic nitrogen produced in the world."

    The proof of concept has already been demonstrated. The uptake and fixation of nitrogen in a range of crop species has been proven to work in the laboratory and Azotic is now working on field trials in order to produce robust efficacy data. This will be followed by seeking regulatory approval for N-Fix initially in the UK, Europe, USA, Canada and Brazil, with more countries to follow.

    It is anticipated that the N-Fix technology will be commercially available within the next two to three years.
    Last edited by Strychnine; 07-26-2013, 10:16 AM.

  • #2
    N-Ice.

    But I wonder if the ability to feed more people is really what the world needs.
    When the government pays, the government controls.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
      N-Ice.

      But I wonder if the ability to feed more people is really what the world needs.
      Shit no.

      But the thought of maintaining current levels with a lot less pollution is cool.

      But that won't make someone somewhere a shitload more money, so yeah we'll probably have a couple billion more people to get pissed at for random stuff sooner than expected.

      Comment


      • #4
        Zombies

        Comment


        • #5
          Say no to the evil GMO foods!

          Comment


          • #6
            Monsanto still the debil.
            Originally posted by davbrucas
            I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

            Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

            You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
              N-Ice.

              But I wonder if the ability to feed more people is really what the world needs.


              People are still starving. I read an article the other day that says we have 2-3x the food needed to feed the entire world. Of course, distribution is the problem.


              And yes, Monsanto is still completely fucked up.
              Originally posted by BradM
              But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
              Originally posted by Leah
              In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

              Comment


              • #8
                That's pretty badass. A lot of people don't understand just how fucked up non-point pollution is, and how much of the world it affects. We could have better seafood quickly if we weren't rendering our estuaries incapable of supporting what they once could. I hope this works, and takes off.
                ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm hungry.

                  You guys should see how much food grocery stores are forced to throw away every night.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by YALE View Post
                    That's pretty badass. A lot of people don't understand just how fucked up non-point pollution is, and how much of the world it affects. We could have better seafood quickly if we weren't rendering our estuaries incapable of supporting what they once could. I hope this works, and takes off.
                    Not to mention the runnoff concerns that rural areas have.
                    "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am curious what Monsanto has to say on this, because of the modifications to their seeds that force you to purchase other products from them annually.

                      I'm also curious how the dead zones would respond and the time frame it would take for life to return to those areas?

                      Comment


                      • #12

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                          I am curious what Monsanto has to say on this, because of the modifications to their seeds that force you to purchase other products from them annually.

                          I'm also curious how the dead zones would respond and the time frame it would take for life to return to those areas?
                          The algae blooms would drop off fast, without the nitrogenous runoff feeding them. The areas would take a while to heal, but it would boom, overall. The big deal about it is that majority of fishing is done on the continental shelves, and the river systems that feed the sea are a huge part of that mechanism. Migratory fish use bays and rivers to spawn and feed, and shellfish beds use the moving water to filter food from. Nitrogen waste, before it causes algae blooms, acidifies the water, and impacts shellfish and crustacean growth and development, which has a cascade effect on the rest of the estuary. Take that away, and well... Nature abhors a vacuum.
                          ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                            I am curious what Monsanto has to say on this, because of the modifications to their seeds that force you to purchase other products from them annually.
                            10:1 Monsanto acquires the rights/patents.
                            I'm also curious how the dead zones would respond and the time frame it would take for life to return to those areas?
                            10-20 years at MINIMUM?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by racrguy View Post
                              10:1 Monsanto acquires the rights/patents.


                              10-20 years at MINIMUM?
                              Whoever funded the research gets the patent, and probably faster than that.
                              ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X