Wild Bill: Possession of child pornography.

[svauto-erotic855]

I want to know what kind of shitbag decides that it's a good idea to save some child porn.

Of equal concern to me is what kind of shitbag wife turns her husband in unless he's actually put his hands on a child.

[svauto-erotic855]

The real lesson to be learned from this is as follows. Even if every word of his story is true this is what you deserve and what you get when you can't mind your own damn business.

[SS Junk]

Of equal concern to me is what kind of shitbag wife turns her husband in unless he's actually put his hands on a child.

Well because merely possessing it is a federal offense and she most likely did not want to be an accessory and get her name dragged into this as well as possibly then believing he was a piece of shit and she wanted nothing to do with him. Smart move on her part.

[svauto-erotic855]

Well because merely possessing it is a federal offense and she most likely did not want to be an accessory and get her name dragged into this as well as possibly then believing he was a piece of shit and she wanted nothing to do with him. Smart move on her part.

Possession of any type of drug along with a firearm in the home is a more serious federal offense than child pronography and I can't tell you how many Highland Park honeys I've seen shoveling cocaine up their noses with a gun sitting on the coffee table in front of them.

You also missed the point I was trying to make. She didn't turn him in for just the child pronography that she found. She turned him in because she found it and she knew that he had monkeyed with kids in the past.

[SS Junk]

You also missed the point I was trying to make. She didn't turn him in for just the child pronography that she found. She turned him in because she found it and she knew that he had monkeyed with kids in the past.

Then why ask "what kind of shitbag wife..." turning him in....

[svauto-erotic855]

Then why ask "what kind of shitbag wife..." turning him in....

There are 2 parts to what I wrote. One calls the wife a shitbag and the second parts absolves her of being a shit bag if the man actually messed with a child.

[SS Junk]

There are 2 parts to what I wrote. One calls the wife a shitbag and the second parts absolves her of being a shit bag if the man actually messed with a child.

But you believe he should not be turned in if he did not diddle a kid, but has kiddie porn?

[Baron Von Crowder]

Didn't he and Barbie have some sort of weird sexual thing going on? I remember him posting all kinds of weird shit where she was also involved in the thread some way...

But read his side he dindunuffin!

I think it was Juggs.

[svauto-erotic855]

But you believe he should not be turned in if he did not diddle a kid, but has kiddie porn?

Correct.

[SS Junk]

Correct.

I'm thinking it's safe to say you're a sick fuck and kids should steer clear of you. For some reason, I believe you are a lying shitbag when it comes to your one up's, but for some reason, fully believe you're a potential kid diddler.

[Tx Redneck]

I'm thinking it's safe to say you're a sick fuck and kids should steer clear of you. For some reason, I believe you are a lying shitbag when it comes to your one up's, but for some reason, fully believe you're a potential kid diddler.

SHOTS FIRED!

[svauto-erotic855]

I'm thinking it's safe to say you're a sick fuck and kids should steer clear of you. For some reason, I believe you are a lying shitbag when it comes to your one up's, but for some reason, fully believe you're a potential kid diddler.

I would argue with you but by your reaction I can tell that you're incapable of rational thought much less the critical thinking skills required to have a rational conversation.

Edit: By the way, I'm around a bunch of kids every day.

[Craizie]

I would argue with you but by your reaction I can tell that you're incapable of rational thought much less the critical thinking skills required to have a rational conversation.

Edit: By the way, I'm around a bunch of kids every day.

He's projecting.

[SS Junk]

I would argue with you but by your reaction I can tell that you're incapable of rational thought much less the critical thinking skills required to have a rational conversation.

Are you ok with someone having pics of naked kids as long as they don't touch them? And you're not ok with a spouse turning you in if she were to find out?

[svauto-erotic855]

Are you ok with someone having pics of naked kids as long as they don't touch them? And you're not ok with a spouse turning you in if she were to find out?

I have a problem with the legal definition of child pronography. I also have a problem with someone's wife snitching on them in general. You also don't know what pictures he was caught with. All you're given is a blanket catch-all phrase of child pronography.