Originally posted by DON SVO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2011 GT. The mustang we've always wanted?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by fordracing19 View PostI have the 3,73 too. On my first tank I avg 16.1 mpg.
My last average was for about 1,200 miles mixed driving, it was 20.8.Originally posted by PGreenCobraI can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!Originally posted by Trip McNeelyOriginally posted by dsrtuckteezydont downshift!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SMKR View Post2012 boss> 2011gt
To the OP, welcome to September 2010. While saying that Ford has needed this for 30 years might be a stretch, I would say that definitely since 1993, they have needed to step it up with the powertrain. It's pretty sad that it's been 18 years since GM started putting a six speed manual in camaros and firebirds, and Ford just now started putting them in non-cobra mustangs."Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson
Comment
-
Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View PostFor a long, long time, Ford fanboys have been wanting the GT to be something like this. 300 HP wasn't bad for the 2005 revision of the mustang, but the car also gained a little weight to go with that. What it really needed was what it got in 2011. For around 30 freakin years, the mustang line has needed this car. Sure they've had some fast cobras, but this is their best GT ever. Making the best affordable fast stang ever. Anyone else think its awesome that they finally did this? I wouldn't doubt that with a couple fairly minor mods, the car can easily see 500hp.
You just blew my mind!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostIf only they would have kept the nicer body of the 05-09 with out rounding every damn corner and adding plastic all the way around the bottom.
Cash flow permitting some time down the road, I'd rather put a 2011 motor in a 2005-09 than buy the new body style. Then again, maybe the next body style will get it right.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Big A View PostThe /M3 has had 400hp+ for years now, and "affordable" is laughable. $40k for a Mustang?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big A View PostThe /M3 has had 400hp+ for years now, and "affordable" is laughable. $40k for a Mustang?"Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slowhand View PostM3 is a nice, direct comparison and good job on your use of the price you'd pay for an absolutely loaded out model! Your use of "years" seems to imply that the M3 has had that power for a lot longer than the 3 years it has had it for, lest we forget the horrific reliability of the E46 cars that came before the E92.Originally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
Comment
Comment