Originally posted by Sgt Beavis
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Camaro outsells Mustang
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by OrangeChevyII View PostI love the new mustang, I love the new camaro. I think it's great they both have new platforms for each car.
The 2011 vert cars are being introduced as we speak, the 2012 Z28 will be introduced this year. GM has played it's cards very well spreading the demand out for the Camaro. The new V6 motors is supposed to be 325 HP and talks are on the table of it being turbo charged.
I am a GM guy and I am happy "Americans" are buying american cars.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OrangeChevyII View PostI am a GM guy and I am happy "Americans" are buying american cars.class joke
{
private:
char Forrest, Jenny, Momma, LtDan;
double Peas, Carrots;
string MommaAlwaysSaid(const bool AddAnyTime = True)
};
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View PostYup, a faster selling but slower car..
K think there are a lot of factors for the Camaro selling better... for instance it is a genuinely good car. Then there is all that pent up demand that spilled over from 2009. Of course there is Fords mistake of offering the 2010 Mustang with lots of mid cycle improvements but with obviously outdated drivetrains.
It certainly didn't hurt the Camaro that it was featured in one of biggest movies of 2009 nor does it hurt that it is a pretty damn good looking car.
But it's still slow..
I sincerely hope that GM keeps the ball rolling on this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poopnut2 View PostProbably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poopnut2 View PostProbably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year._____________________________________________
Comment
-
Originally posted by Denny View PostDo you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?"Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson
Comment
-
Originally posted by poopnut2 View PostDid you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.
Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?
Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.
Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.
EDIT: 2005-2010 was rated at 210hp.Last edited by jdgregory84; 01-12-2011, 12:58 AM."Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson
Comment
Comment