Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Camaro outsells Mustang

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View Post
    Competition is always a good thing......



    But, isn't the Camaro a Canadian car? You know, like that other website.
    Aussie.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by OrangeChevyII View Post
      I love the new mustang, I love the new camaro. I think it's great they both have new platforms for each car.

      The 2011 vert cars are being introduced as we speak, the 2012 Z28 will be introduced this year. GM has played it's cards very well spreading the demand out for the Camaro. The new V6 motors is supposed to be 325 HP and talks are on the table of it being turbo charged.

      I am a GM guy and I am happy "Americans" are buying american cars.
      Theres also talk of the cam in cam design for 2012

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by sc281 View Post
        Aussie.
        Aussie designed.. Canadian Built..

        Challenger = German Designed and Canadian built.

        Mustang = American Designed and American Built

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by 90GT50 View Post
          Yeah, but the mustang outsold camaro in 2003-2009!
          I see what you did there!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by OrangeChevyII View Post
            I am a GM guy and I am happy "Americans" are buying american cars.
            Is "American cars" means Mercedes built in Alabama, Toyotas built in Texas or something else?
            class joke
            {
            private:
            char Forrest, Jenny, Momma, LtDan;
            double Peas, Carrots;
            string MommaAlwaysSaid(const bool AddAnyTime = True)
            };

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by TexasDevilDog View Post
              Is "American cars" means Mercedes built in Alabama, Toyotas built in Texas or something else?
              Good point there. Most parts that are made for the big 3 are made over seas.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View Post
                Yup, a faster selling but slower car..

                K think there are a lot of factors for the Camaro selling better... for instance it is a genuinely good car. Then there is all that pent up demand that spilled over from 2009. Of course there is Fords mistake of offering the 2010 Mustang with lots of mid cycle improvements but with obviously outdated drivetrains.

                It certainly didn't hurt the Camaro that it was featured in one of biggest movies of 2009 nor does it hurt that it is a pretty damn good looking car.

                But it's still slow..
                That demand showed, and should propel the brand to improve in the future. GM better keep up the quality and appeal that this brand deserves, and innovate to keep up with it's ever improving competition.

                I sincerely hope that GM keeps the ball rolling on this.

                Comment


                • #23
                  GM built up high demand for the new camaro. The new camaro has pretty high quality in it compared to the previous F-body, and gave both hardcore fans and newcomers something to like.

                  Coming out of the gate with a 300HP V6 woke a loooot of people up, im sure.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
                    Probably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
                    Do you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
                      Probably because the 5.0/3.7 engines were announced for 2011 and nobody wanted to "waste" money on a new mustang until the new engines were available. I have a feeling mustang sales will put camaro sales to shame next year.
                      :golf clap:
                      _____________________________________________

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Denny View Post
                        Do you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
                        The 2010 v6 mustang was a pile of shit like the v8.

                        So his point still stands.

                        320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                        DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Denny View Post
                          Do you really think the V8 sales make up the majority of those numbers?
                          Did you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.

                          Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?
                          "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                            The 2010 v6 mustang was a pile of shit like the v8.

                            So his point still stands.
                            His problem was memory after reading the statement. I mentioned the V6.
                            "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by poopnut2 View Post
                              Did you black out after the /? I said 5.0/3.7.

                              Ummmm...215(225?)hp 4.0 V6 rated at 25mpg or 3.7 liter with over 300hp rated at 31mpg?
                              4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.

                              Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.

                              320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                              DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                                4.0 in 05-09 was 200hp. Lol don't give that ranger engine any more credit then it deserves.

                                Friend raced a 3.8 v6 in a 5.3 suburban. Burb got it by 2 burban lengths.
                                Damn. Three boat lengths?

                                EDIT: 2005-2010 was rated at 210hp.
                                Last edited by jdgregory84; 01-12-2011, 12:58 AM.
                                "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X