Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

52% 420 Friendly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rick Modena
    replied
    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
    Who are you to say they can't defend themselves? My father is 74 and more than capable of beating someone's ass. They also have a choice to arm themselves. They also have a choice of not letting said offender in the house. They also have the choice to call LE. They've got a ton of options, and I've only scratched the surface.


    Your argument has more holes than Swiss cheese. Like I said, poor example. Please try again.
    lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ-95GT
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • ELVIS
    replied
    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
    Who are you to say they can't defend themselves? My father is 74 and more than capable of beating someone's ass. They also have a choice to arm themselves. They also have a choice of not letting said offender in the house. They also have the choice to call LE. They've got a ton of options, and I've only scratched the surface.


    Your argument has more holes than Swiss cheese. Like I said, poor example. Please try again.


    god bless.

    Leave a comment:


  • bcoop
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    No, it's really not. When someone cannot defend themselves, it is pure victimization.
    Who are you to say they can't defend themselves? My father is 74 and more than capable of beating someone's ass. They also have a choice to arm themselves. They also have a choice of not letting said offender in the house. They also have the choice to call LE. They've got a ton of options, and I've only scratched the surface.


    Your argument has more holes than Swiss cheese. Like I said, poor example. Please try again.

    Leave a comment:


  • lowthreeohz
    replied
    Originally posted by lo3oz View Post
    Where's that line of questioning headed? Im a fan and smoke on occasion...proceed with making your point.
    .....

    Leave a comment:


  • ceyko
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    No, it's really not. When someone cannot defend themselves, it is pure victimization.
    You're basing your opinion on protecting everyone by removing the ability for people to make good/bad choices. At the end of the day it only affects folks like myself, because now it is illegal for me to do something I'd enjoy. I do not smoke because it is illegal, but I do consume a lot of beer and piss a lot - because that is legal.

    Then there are the grey area people who closet do drugs and most people would never know it.

    Alas, then the dumb asses are still dumb asses out there for you to arrest.

    I typically strongly disagree with a few people posting in this thread, however just like bad drunks - people who can't be responsible with drugs (whatever type) are still going to be there for you to arrest. In my opinion in your "victimization" scenario is crap - it's still there and drugs are illegal!

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    That's fucking weak. Do you remember the mom with the kids in the soccer van that you cut off and possibly made them wreck out causing injury that happened 22 years ago??? Also, perception is the key here. What is "inconsequential" to you may be monumental to someone else.
    So why should their monumental situations dictate what I do?

    Is drinking or smoking illegal?
    What's the difference, outside of its legal status?
    Not surprised.
    What's surprising is someone who has never even smoked a cigarette. Have you ever had an alcoholic beverage
    Pro Liberty huh? So much as to where it infringes on other's freedoms???
    You didn't listen to what I said.
    And I've said it before, I've NEVER smoked a cigarette, much less weed.
    Not surprised.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Lol, yeah smoking weed really infringes on people's rights. But that's only from a black market created by prohibition policies.

    Leave a comment:


  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    One would hope they could recall possibly messing up someones life over inconsequential bullshit.
    That's fucking weak. Do you remember the mom with the kids in the soccer van that you cut off and possibly made them wreck out causing injury that happened 22 years ago??? Also, perception is the key here. What is "inconsequential" to you may be monumental to someone else.


    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    This would have been the more appropriate statement. More to that point, would you arrest someone because they were drinking around their children, what about smoking cigarettes?
    Is drinking or smoking illegal?

    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    I don't see how it's relevant, but I'll play your little game. Not with ANY sense of regularity, no. I can count on one hand the number of times I smoked in the past 15 years.
    Not surprised.

    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    It's not so much that I'm anti-drug law, as it is that I'm pro-liberty.

    Why are you so pro-drug laws? Have you EVER smoked pot?
    Pro Liberty huh? So much as to where it infringes on other's freedoms???

    And I've said it before, I've NEVER smoked a cigarette, much less weed.

    Leave a comment:


  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
    Kick him the fuck out, and change the locks. Sorry, but that's a poor example.
    No, it's really not. When someone cannot defend themselves, it is pure victimization.

    Leave a comment:


  • Josh.0
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post

    Why are you so pro-drug laws? Have you EVER smoked pot?

    you know what his answer is going to be...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tannerm
    replied
    Originally posted by FunFordCobra View Post
    I think tanner and 03 should blaze at least once in their life. It would be hysterical!
    Eff u hose jockey! I would be the guy who would call the cops on himself due to not fully grasping the trip! Lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    Well, I can't hardly say "never" when it has been 22 years........
    One would hope they could recall possibly messing up someones life over inconsequential bullshit.
    I can say that I cannot recall ever having done so.
    This would have been the more appropriate statement. More to that point, would you arrest someone because they were drinking around their children, what about smoking cigarettes?
    So, Shawn/Sean, are you a fan of the dope? Do you do it?
    I don't see how it's relevant, but I'll play your little game. Not with ANY sense of regularity, no. I can count on one hand the number of times I smoked in the past 15 years.
    Why are you so against the drug laws?
    It's not so much that I'm anti-drug law, as it is that I'm pro-liberty.

    Why are you so pro-drug laws? Have you EVER smoked pot?

    Leave a comment:


  • bcoop
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    What about a doper in his 40's victimizing his parents who are in their 80's?

    There's a point in where people just can't stand up to predators.
    Kick him the fuck out, and change the locks. Sorry, but that's a poor example.

    Leave a comment:


  • lowthreeohz
    replied
    Where's that line of questioning headed? Im a fan and smoke on occasion...proceed with making your point.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X