I say G35.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sedan Options
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostThey are neck in neck in TQ and the AWD will be heavier so that puts the HP and performance times pretty close.
Though since you posted a brand new Acura that sells for right at 40k, thats a hell of alot more than 15k. A 2008 or older Acura with V-6, now this is more of an performance advatage for the new Fusion.
2008 Acura TL Base engine: 3.2L 258 hp V6
Horsepower: 258 @ 6200 RPM
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chili View Post2.0 Ecoboost = 240/270
3.7 SH-AWD = 305/273
These things handle better than any car I have driven and are incredible looking.
The torque vectoring AWD is rated as highly or better than BMW and Benz in published tests / reviews I have read. 130 mph on the highway is effortless and feels like 80mph.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chili View PostI still guarantee our Acura will out perform the 2.0 Fusion easily.
Not sure whats out there for 15K in rwd performance without having age and issues.Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cooter View PostYUP! The previous generation was a really nice looking car. This thing is an unbalanced, nose-heavy, hose beast
And as far as the unbalanced, nose heavy comment, that couldn't be farther from the truth. It handles with more balance, torque, and maneuverability than any other car I've driven. :-)Token Split Tail
Originally posted by slow99Lmao...my favorite female poster strikes again.Originally posted by Pokulski-BlatzYou are a moron .... you were fucking with the most powerful vagina on DFW(MU)stangs.
Comment
Comment