Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Those with boys... turtleneck, or no turtleneck?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mstng86
    replied
    Originally posted by Snatch Napkin View Post
    If too much is taken off then erections become incredibly painful.
    and there probably isnt an easy way to fix that.

    Leave a comment:


  • 4.6coupe
    replied
    But after a few days of applying vaseline and gauze he was doing better. You could tell he was very sensitive during diaper changes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snatch Napkin
    replied
    Originally posted by mstng86 View Post
    I wouldnt be worried so much about nerves being severed as I would be with taking TOO much skin off.
    If too much is taken off then erections become incredibly painful.

    Leave a comment:


  • 4.6coupe
    replied
    Originally posted by Treasure Chest View Post
    You do know that pain medication isn't always used for routine infant circumcision, right?
    If im not mistaken they just use some oral tylenol to make them sleepy and a local ointment.

    It wears off after awhile.

    Leave a comment:


  • mstng86
    replied
    I wouldnt be worried so much about nerves being severed as I would be with taking TOO much skin off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Treasure Chest
    replied
    Originally posted by Redd View Post
    http://www.drmomma.org/2009/10/mri-s...y-altered.html



    Yea lets chop on a infants penis, with no drugs and see if the kid goes ape shit and has a mind change process... Lets see you do the same to a grown man in his 50s and his mind not fucked with after having the most sensitive part of a man cut on being awake and in pain. Might as well use a dremel, some gasoline and a match in the process.
    You do know that pain medication isn't always used for routine infant circumcision, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • 4.6coupe
    replied
    Originally posted by Snatch Napkin View Post
    I've never had an issue deploying microscopic tadpoles. I just wonder if there would be more sensitivity than what I have. A bunch of nerves are severed down there.

    This was my point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redd
    replied


    Since no metal objects could be used because of the high magnetic fields, the doctor who performed the surgery used a plastic bell ("Plastibell") with a sterilized obsidian bade to cut the foreskin. No anaesthetic was used.
    Yea lets chop on a infants penis, with no drugs and see if the kid goes ape shit and has a mind change process... Lets see you do the same to a grown man in his 50s and his mind not fucked with after having the most sensitive part of a man cut on being awake and in pain. Might as well use a dremel, some gasoline and a match in the process.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snatch Napkin
    replied
    I've never had an issue deploying microscopic tadpoles. I just wonder if there would be more sensitivity than what I have. A bunch of nerves are severed down there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Taylor
    replied
    If I have a boy, I'll leave him be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Treasure Chest
    replied
    Originally posted by Redd View Post
    yea and were done with no anaesthetic, that plays a big part too. Put any infant through some serious pain, of course it will have some effect, But being numbed up is a different story IMO



    Its been done for decades, millions of men turned out fine. My pain tolerance is higher than the average person.


    All these studies in todays world are all an opinion of some Dr. and some of them are a crock of shit.
    There was also a time when female circumcision was performed because it was thought to be "cleaner." Now, it's considered mutilation. .

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    Originally posted by 8mpg View Post
    Sounds like a load of bullshit to me.. Im guessing a single study showed a slight correlation with a very small sample size. Lots of study are shit. There was a study recently stating propranolol reduces racism... Yeah right
    A similar study, that I just made up, says that propranolol turns blacks white, thus reducing racism.

    Leave a comment:


  • 8mpg
    replied
    Originally posted by Treasure Chest View Post
    They did MRIs of infant brains. They showed that the circumcised kiddos brains were basically rewired.
    Sounds like a load of bullshit to me.. Im guessing a single study showed a slight correlation with a very small sample size. Lots of study are shit. There was a study recently stating propranolol reduces racism... Yeah right

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    I love the sensitivity argument. I have NEVER failed to deploy swimmers. I'll credit being cut for my inability to prematurely ejactulate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redd
    replied
    yea and were done with no anaesthetic, that plays a big part too. Put any infant through some serious pain, of course it will have some effect, But being numbed up is a different story IMO



    Its been done for decades, millions of men turned out fine. My pain tolerance is higher than the average person.


    All these studies in todays world are all an opinion of some Dr. and some of them are a crock of shit.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X