should tricker treaters with NO costumes get candy?

[5.0 n it]

proceed..

[Damnittsteve]

nope, thats just looting.

[talisman]

No.

[Geor!]

Nope, neither should anybody who looks over 12.

[Damnittsteve]

ugh, just had one, but i gave her candy anyway since she was 3 and it wasnt her fault her parents are cheap

[Damnittsteve]

Nope, neither should anybody who looks over 12.

eh, i draw the line at when they can drive a car legally and go buy their own candy.

[GhostTX]

Young kids without cosutumes? Debatable. 12 to 15 without costumes? No. 16+? Get a job.

[Couver]

I do if they are under 12 it is not their fault in theory. I do give them a bit less for lack of effort just like the ones who stand there holding out their bag without saying a word.

** edit spelling I am getting a lot of them tonight must be the weather.

[5.0 n it]

Call me cheap but the ones who don't have costumes get "A" piece of candy haha

[Juiced4v]

Naah braa...

[5.0 n it]

I do if they are under 12 it is not their fault in theory. I do give them a bit less for lack of effort just like the ones who stand there holding out their back without saying a word.

I'm with you on that

[Trip McNeely]

You better if you don't want your house egged.

[Damnittsteve]

You better if you don't want your house egged.

if you're lucky, these days the lil bastards will bust your tires

[Baron Von Crowder]

Nope. I used to let my mastiff/boxer mix open the door if I saw either a group with no costume of older kids. We called it "trick " and he knew the difference after the first year. Trick meant he was up, treat meant to stand back. That dog was smarter than half the trickortreaters.

[idrivea4banger]

No