I didn't misspeak, nor mis-type. It reads plainly enough. It's almost like you've become a democrat. Cops do not get to shoot someone suspected of committing a crime. If they shoot someone who is an immediate deadly threat who is also suspected of a crime, then they were shot because of the immediate and deadly threat. Do you get it? Probably not.
Can't admit a mistake. Sounds like you're the democrat. PEOPLE IN THE ACT OF COMMITTING A CRIME ARE SUSPECTED OF COMMITTING A CRIME UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Do you get it? Probably not. You're one stubborn s.o.b.
Watch a few of the chase videos that end up with what they are calling a splash down and you'll understand why they took the shot. They'll run over any and everything to make it to the border, once they hit the river they are free to swim back across. Sometimes even with the Mexican military watching the whole thing to make sure our guys don't follow them across.
I didn't misspeak, nor mis-type. It reads plainly enough. It's almost like you've become a democrat. Cops do not get to shoot someone suspected of committing a crime. If they shoot someone who is an immediate deadly threat who is also suspected of a crime, then they were shot because of the immediate and deadly threat. Do you get it? Probably not.
You can't shoot someone solely because they're a "suspect". Phrase it however you'd like, but it's a bad shoot. A person who is an immediate deadly threat can be suspected of another crime, or vise versa, but they are not mutually exclusive.
Watch a few of the chase videos that end up with what they are calling a splash down and you'll understand why they took the shot. They'll run over any and everything to make it to the border, once they hit the river they are free to swim back across. Sometimes even with the Mexican military watching the whole thing to make sure our guys don't follow them across.
Yes. How does that make the people that they do generally shoot, not suspects? It does not.
You can't shoot someone solely because they're a "suspect". Phrase it however you'd like, but it's a bad shoot. A person who is an immediate deadly threat can be suspected of another crime, or vise versa, but they are not mutually exclusive.
I say fuck it, take them out. Anyone running from the police and endangering the public should be shot at or just shot period. Just to take the fucking fun out of running from the police.
Every time I see a police chase going from City to City, I just want to say "Shoot the bitches" My cousin was on channel 4 news running from the police, pit maneuvered several cop cars. If they shot his ass, I would feel bad, but damn if he did not deserve it if they did. He got 5 years instead. Very lucky.
Lawyers make it very easy for people to take chances on public roads.
A cop cannot shoot a murder suspect if the suspect is non-violent when approached for arrest. There is a difference between suspected of a crime and a real, immediate deadly threat.
Yes. How does that make the people that they do generally shoot, not suspects? It does not.
Leave a comment: