Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TX DPS Helicopter Shooting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BradM
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike View Post
    Depends on how much the police have had to drink that night.
    2 beers, it's always 2 beers.

    And a sprinkle of crack.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike
    replied
    Originally posted by BradM View Post
    Should police shoot people that are not suspected of committing a crime? People who are not suspects?
    Too many variables in this question.

    Were the cops drunk?
    Do they have guns or drugs they can plant on the "perp"
    Did they intend to shoot the person, or was it an accident?

    I'd say it really depends on how much they've had to drink the night of the incident.

    Leave a comment:


  • BradM
    replied
    Should police shoot people that are not suspected of committing a crime? People who are not suspects?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike
    replied
    Round Two



    FIGHT

    Leave a comment:


  • BradM
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View Post
    I didn't misspeak, nor mis-type. It reads plainly enough. It's almost like you've become a democrat. Cops do not get to shoot someone suspected of committing a crime. If they shoot someone who is an immediate deadly threat who is also suspected of a crime, then they were shot because of the immediate and deadly threat. Do you get it? Probably not.
    Can't admit a mistake. Sounds like you're the democrat. PEOPLE IN THE ACT OF COMMITTING A CRIME ARE SUSPECTED OF COMMITTING A CRIME UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Do you get it? Probably not. You're one stubborn s.o.b.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by BP View Post
    Watch a few of the chase videos that end up with what they are calling a splash down and you'll understand why they took the shot. They'll run over any and everything to make it to the border, once they hit the river they are free to swim back across. Sometimes even with the Mexican military watching the whole thing to make sure our guys don't follow them across.
    That doesn't change the legality of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by BradM View Post
    You just can not admit that you misspoke.
    I didn't misspeak, nor mis-type. It reads plainly enough. It's almost like you've become a democrat. Cops do not get to shoot someone suspected of committing a crime. If they shoot someone who is an immediate deadly threat who is also suspected of a crime, then they were shot because of the immediate and deadly threat. Do you get it? Probably not.

    Leave a comment:


  • BradM
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View Post
    You can't shoot someone solely because they're a "suspect". Phrase it however you'd like, but it's a bad shoot. A person who is an immediate deadly threat can be suspected of another crime, or vise versa, but they are not mutually exclusive.
    You just can not admit that you misspoke.

    Leave a comment:


  • BP
    replied
    Watch a few of the chase videos that end up with what they are calling a splash down and you'll understand why they took the shot. They'll run over any and everything to make it to the border, once they hit the river they are free to swim back across. Sometimes even with the Mexican military watching the whole thing to make sure our guys don't follow them across.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by BradM View Post
    Yes. How does that make the people that they do generally shoot, not suspects? It does not.
    You can't shoot someone solely because they're a "suspect". Phrase it however you'd like, but it's a bad shoot. A person who is an immediate deadly threat can be suspected of another crime, or vise versa, but they are not mutually exclusive.

    Leave a comment:


  • 95DRGT
    replied
    Originally posted by 89FivePointOh View Post
    Fuck that. Must be a Rick Perry law that he sees "fit".
    Adios mofo

    Leave a comment:


  • BradM
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    Lets argue semantics some more! Lol

    A person being the suspect of a crime isn't the sole determining factor in regards to them getting a few new holes.
    I can't even see the hair to split it another time.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by BradM View Post
    Yes. How does that make the people that they do generally shoot, not suspects? It does not.
    Lets argue semantics some more! Lol

    A person being the suspect of a crime isn't the sole determining factor in regards to them getting a few new holes.

    Leave a comment:


  • SSMAN
    replied
    I say fuck it, take them out. Anyone running from the police and endangering the public should be shot at or just shot period. Just to take the fucking fun out of running from the police.

    Every time I see a police chase going from City to City, I just want to say "Shoot the bitches" My cousin was on channel 4 news running from the police, pit maneuvered several cop cars. If they shot his ass, I would feel bad, but damn if he did not deserve it if they did. He got 5 years instead. Very lucky.

    Lawyers make it very easy for people to take chances on public roads.

    Leave a comment:


  • BradM
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View Post
    A cop cannot shoot a murder suspect if the suspect is non-violent when approached for arrest. There is a difference between suspected of a crime and a real, immediate deadly threat.
    Yes. How does that make the people that they do generally shoot, not suspects? It does not.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X