Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Potheads enter please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy View Post
    haha alright dude...weed is just like any other technologically advanced thing...everything is bigger and better today

    guys crossbreed the best bud to come up with some frankenstein shit...shit youve never had
    The (15-20% THC) strains has been in existance since before me. "Regular" weed is probably more potent on average, but the premo weed potency hasn't changed though.

    There were South East Asian strains reported by DEA testing in the early to mid 70's that were 20%+, as well as several Hawiian strains that were reproted to be in the mid to high 20% level. Real Santa Marta Columbian reds and golds were in the 12-15% range. So when it comes to potency, it is not higher than many strains available in the 70's and 80's, only thing that has changed is there are more of them. The late 80's to late 90's bought on a breeding revolution which created 100's of strains which ranged from the 10% to high 20% range. We must also remember that many of the strains that were available from the late 60's to early 80's were used to create many of the strains of today. In many cases, some strains are not new, only the phenotypes are new.
    Photobucket

    Comment


    • #47
      Sup gauiz!

      15 bluntz are possible if you are damnitsteve and the only shit you smoke is mexi shwag.
      Full time ninja editor.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
        The (15-20% THC) strains has been in existance since before me. "Regular" weed is probably more potent on average, but the premo weed potency hasn't changed though.

        There were South East Asian strains reported by DEA testing in the early to mid 70's that were 20%+, as well as several Hawiian strains that were reproted to be in the mid to high 20% level. Real Santa Marta Columbian reds and golds were in the 12-15% range. So when it comes to potency, it is not higher than many strains available in the 70's and 80's, only thing that has changed is there are more of them. The late 80's to late 90's bought on a breeding revolution which created 100's of strains which ranged from the 10% to high 20% range. We must also remember that many of the strains that were available from the late 60's to early 80's were used to create many of the strains of today. In many cases, some strains are not new, only the phenotypes are new.


        There is no way in hell you correctly used the word phenotypes. Most obvious cut and paste ever.

        Comment


        • #49
          Truth in post 48. Never even heard of a phenotype before...
          www.allforoneroofing.com

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by talisman View Post
            There is no way in hell you correctly used the word phenotypes. Most obvious cut and paste ever.
            I am getting back to token after at least a 20 year hiatus. So what's the deal with prices these days? Has pot over the last 20 or so years become...
            Full time ninja editor.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by talisman View Post
              There is no way in hell you correctly used the word phenotypes. Most obvious cut and paste ever.
              True. Not sure what your point is though.
              Photobucket

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
                True. Not sure what your point is though.
                Phenotype was a word that was new to him, so, no way you knew it if he didn't.

                My guess at least...
                www.allforoneroofing.com

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by BlackSnake View Post
                  True. Not sure what your point is though.


                  Always cite your sources. Has the appearance of plagiarism otherwise.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by mikec View Post
                    Phenotype was a word that was new to him, so, no way you knew it if he didn't.

                    My guess at least...

                    I know what phenotypes are.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by talisman View Post
                      Always cite your sources. Has the appearance of plagiarism otherwise.
                      Yeah. I prolly should have. Its good reading though.
                      Photobucket

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        LMAO at needing sources to talk on a forum.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by mstng86 View Post
                          LMAO at needing sources to talk on a forum.
                          Only on Stangs. I know better than to argue here. You guys are relentless sometimes.
                          Photobucket

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            I don't care what you call it I just want a bag of F'in weed. Lol best line in a movie ever and yes if he has a job life etc then no way 15 if he is a guy who buys it with his food stamp card and games all day ya I could see that. Knew a guy that made 100k a year worked 50-60 hours a week and he was a wake and bake kinda guy went out at lunch for a top off and blazed after work and still only went through an ounce and a half a week so I couldn't see 15 blunts a day. Granted that was when you could get the good stuff at $75 an ounce.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by talisman View Post
                              Always cite your sources. Has the appearance of plagiarism otherwise.
                              And you can't have plagiarism on a pot thread. They'll come after you.
                              I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                since its election year and some of us are hoping to get this shit legalized lets end this thread.
                                THE BAD HOMBRE

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X