Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FWPD Shoots and kills family dog while at wrong address
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostHow can it be legally or procedurally correct when the cop is the only one in the situation who made a mistake? What about personal responsibility? Is he not responsible? I guess he just gets a pass.
It is called the "Good Faith Exception". If the officer went to the house in "good faith" and made a mistake, it is/can be mitigated. A simple mistake led to a tragic event, and it cannot be taken back. I feel horrible for the owners (and the dog), but it happened. It's not like the officer found a house with a similar number, a dog, and thought "Oh geez, here's my chance" and shot the dog.
I hope the city tries to make this situation right. If it were my officer, I would go meet with them and offer an apology and explanation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostIt is called the "Good Faith Exception". If the officer went to the house in "good faith" and made a mistake, it is/can be mitigated. A simple mistake led to a tragic event, and it cannot be taken back. I feel horrible for the owners (and the dog), but it happened. It's not like the officer found a house with a similar number, a dog, and thought "Oh geez, here's my chance" and shot the dog.
I hope the city tries to make this situation right. If it were my officer, I would go meet with them and offer an apology and explanation.
How do you know this?Ded
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostIt is called the "Good Faith Exception". If the officer went to the house in "good faith" and made a mistake, it is/can be mitigated. A simple mistake led to a tragic event, and it cannot be taken back. I feel horrible for the owners (and the dog), but it happened. It's not like the officer found a house with a similar number, a dog, and thought "Oh geez, here's my chance" and shot the dog.
I hope the city tries to make this situation right. If it were my officer, I would go meet with them and offer an apology and explanation.How do we forget ourselves? How do we forget our minds?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mach1Run View PostPurple paint?
Originally posted by Samhain View Post§ 30.05. CRIMINAL TRESPASS. (a) A person commits an
offense if he enters or remains on or in property, including an
aircraft or other vehicle, of another without effective consent or
he enters or remains in a building of another without effective
consent and he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.
(b) For purposes of this section:
(1) "Entry" means the intrusion of the entire body.
(2) "Notice" means:
(A) oral or written communication by the owner or
someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;
(B) fencing or other enclosure obviously
designed to exclude intruders or to contain livestock;
(C) a sign or signs posted on the property or at
the entrance to the building, reasonably likely to come to the
attention of intruders, indicating that entry is forbidden;
(D) the placement of identifying purple paint
marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks
are:
(i) vertical lines of not less than eight
inches in length and not less than one inch in width;
(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark
is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet
from the ground; and
(iii) placed at locations that are readily
visible to any person approaching the property and no more than:
(a) 100 feet apart on forest land; or
(b) 1,000 feet apart on land other
than forest land; or
(E) the visible presence on the property of a
crop grown for human consumption that is under cultivation, in the
process of being harvested, or marketable if harvested at the time
of entry.
(3) "Shelter center" has the meaning assigned by
Section 51.002, Human Resources Code.
(4) "Forest land" means land on which the trees are
potentially valuable for timber products.
(5) "Agricultural land" has the meaning assigned by
Section 75.001, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(6) "Superfund site" means a facility that:
(A) is on the National Priorities List
established under Section 105 of the federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42
U.S.C. Section 9605); or
(B) is listed on the state registry established
under Section 361.181, Health and Safety Code.
(7) "Critical infrastructure facility" means one of
the following, if completely enclosed by a fence or other physical
barrier that is obviously designed to exclude intruders:
(A) a chemical manufacturing facility;
(B) a refinery;
(C) an electrical power generating facility,
substation, switching station, electrical control center, or
electrical transmission or distribution facility;
(D) a water intake structure, water treatment
facility, wastewater treatment plant, or pump station;
(E) a natural gas transmission compressor
station;
(F) a liquid natural gas terminal or storage
facility;
(G) a telecommunications central switching
office;
(H) a port, railroad switching yard, trucking
terminal, or other freight transportation facility;
(I) a gas processing plant, including a plant
used in the processing, treatment, or fractionation of natural gas;
or
(J) a transmission facility used by a federally
licensed radio or television station.Whos your Daddy?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Geofster View PostIf a neighbor calls me and asks me for a cup of sugar and I bring it by the wrong house, their dog attacks me at that house and I shoot the dog, I wouldn't get a good faith exception. I'd get charged with a fucking crime.Whos your Daddy?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Geofster View PostWell no, I don't really feel the need to follow all threads on the board but I don't believe that shit for a minute.Whos your Daddy?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostIt is called the "Good Faith Exception". If the officer went to the house in "good faith" and made a mistake, it is/can be mitigated. A simple mistake led to a tragic event, and it cannot be taken back. I feel horrible for the owners (and the dog), but it happened. It's not like the officer found a house with a similar number, a dog, and thought "Oh geez, here's my chance" and shot the dog.
I hope the city tries to make this situation right. If it were my officer, I would go meet with them and offer an apology and explanation.Originally posted by BradMBut, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.Originally posted by LeahIn other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kingjason View PostYou have the right to not be bitten by a dog. If you believe you are in danger of bodily injury you can shoot a dog. People do it all the time it just so happens it was a police officer this time.How do we forget ourselves? How do we forget our minds?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Geofster View PostThe scumbag officer wasn't bitten according to the story. Taking that into context, you can see how I meant "attacked" in a loose manner. Fuck y'alls justifications, the shit is wrong.Whos your Daddy?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kingjason View PostYou do not have to be bitten to believe you are in danger of bodily injury. You do not have to be shot at to use deadly force. I understand that some dog lovers will not get it. Not every one on this planet has the same same beliefs. We can agree to disagree. There are plenty of people out there that believe you should be able to move around in a public place without being charged by a dog in any manner. It sucks but it happened.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kingjason View PostYou do not have to be bitten to believe you are in danger of bodily injury. You do not have to be shot at to use deadly force. I understand that some dog lovers will not get it.
Case in point my son decided to take a ride on his bike last week, he took a short cut through the McDermotts property and he started getting chased by a big dog, he kicked it into high gear and hauled ass aout of there. When he got home and told me the story, I told him that if the dog would took a chunck out if his ass, it was his fault for being on the dogs property and to not do it again.Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kingjason View PostYou do not have to be bitten to believe you are in danger of bodily injury. You do not have to be shot at to use deadly force. I understand that some dog lovers will not get it. Not every one on this planet has the same same beliefs. We can agree to disagree. There are plenty of people out there that believe you should be able to move around in a public place without being charged by a dog in any manner. It sucks but it happened.How do we forget ourselves? How do we forget our minds?
Comment
Comment