Garland SWAT get 3 dogs in one raid

[Forever_frost]

So there has never been a dog bite or attack outside the confines of home walls?


I know you're not going to answer that, because all you are focused on is one thing.

You might benefit from the skills of expanded thinking or multitasking.

Have cops ever shot innocents or engaged in unlawful activities?

If a cop can shoot a dog because of past actions of other dogs, wouldn't it make sense that cops can be shot for past actions of other cops?


Edited to add: No, I do not think shooting cops is a good thing, just in case someone thought otherwise. However, I'm sure most of you know my view on trespassing

[03trubluGT]

There needs to be an overhaul of the entire policing system, but there is a few downfalls to a "one size fits all" police standard.

I can tell you the first people that would scream is the ACLU.

They are afraid of a national police force, it would reek of big brother on roids.

If there was a national standard for policing, I'm sure there would be some federal liability and the feds don't want that.

Back on topic.

You guys have no clue what goes into a dog shooting. They are classified as "CPI" (Critical Police Incidents) and the last one I did where the officer was attacked he shot at and missed the dog. The dog decided he didn't want to eat the officer after the loud bang and ran.

I still have to do a complete supervisory investigation which entails calling Crime Scene out to do a detailed scale diagram of the scene. It ends up being about a 35 page report.

Trust me, every one of my peeps know what goes into a CPI, and how I dislike them. If there is an option, they are to exercise it. I don't like killing dogs, but there are times that it is justified (no, and not just because a dog barks at someone).

Animal Control has even put out a slide show presentation on the true signs of aggression of dogs. I've held documented training on it to reduce these kinds of incidents.

Guys, the short answer is I don't have a answer that will fit every scenario. The span of control I have is all I can do, and I don't like seeing this any more than any of you do.

[03trubluGT]

Ahem..




Stevo

You sure are an out of context posting mother fukker.

[03trubluGT]

Maybe the thread hasn't gotten there yet, but you usually defend the thin blue line, regardless of the acts of an officer.

God dammit give me the chance to do it before you convict me.

[Sean88gt]

Sean, show me where I addressed this topic at all, let alone defended the topic of the OP.


I made a comment about dogs attacking someone, and never once addressed the legality or appropriateness of the Garland PD in the story.

Maybe the thread hasn't gotten there yet, but you usually defend the thin blue line, regardless of the acts of an officer.

I thought that was just you and Tali, man that Tali gets around!!

You should know, sugar tits!

[DaisyDoesDallas]

dont for get the buttsecks those tequilla shots led you two lovebirds to!

god bless.

I thought that was just you and Tali, man that Tali gets around!!

[Wicked98Snake]

When police officers organize a raid don't they survey the property in advance so they aren't going in blind? You would think it wold have been known that they're three dogs in the household and they should have taken necessary steps to avoid the situation completely. If they knew the dogs are in the house do they assign certain officers to shoot the dog or take care of the situation or just whoever the dog is charging dispatch it as soon as an opportunity presents itself?

What kind of steps? Like looking at a picture of their crappy house on google earth to see if the have any dogs or stargazers that they need to be sure and not kill?

[Broncojohnny]

When police officers organize a raid don't they survey the property in advance so they aren't going in blind? You would think it wold have been known that they're three dogs in the household and they should have taken necessary steps to avoid the situation completely. If they knew the dogs are in the house do they assign certain officers to shoot the dog or take care of the situation or just whoever the dog is charging dispatch it as soon as an opportunity presents itself?

Why would they bother with all that when they can just shoot the dogs for even looking at them wrong? When the standard you have to meet is "I feel scared!" it doesn't take even a child too long to figure out that you can use that as an excuse to get away with all sorts of shit.

[bcoop]

haha! Man, even if i wanted to ban elvis i couldn't, me and that white person have an understanding...

jwp

[Rick Modena]

Henry - ban hammer. Quick. And no, not Matt.

HAHA! Man, even if I wanted to BAN Elvis I couldn't, me and that cracker have an understanding...

[bcoop]

Henry - ban hammer. Quick. And no, not Matt.

[ELVIS]

When police officers organize a raid don't they survey the property in advance so they aren't going in blind? You would think it wold have been known that they're three dogs in the household and they should have taken necessary steps to avoid the situation completely. If they knew the dogs are in the house do they assign certain officers to shoot the dog or take care of the situation or just whoever the dog is charging dispatch it as soon as an opportunity presents itself?

possibly one of the 8lb dog turds in the backyard would give them a clue that there is a big dog in there

god bless.

[Jwp]

When police officers organize a raid don't they survey the property in advance so they aren't going in blind? You would think it wold have been known that they're three dogs in the household and they should have taken necessary steps to avoid the situation completely. If they knew the dogs are in the house do they assign certain officers to shoot the dog or take care of the situation or just whoever the dog is charging dispatch it as soon as an opportunity presents itself?

[Rick Modena]

I said hi to Matt earlier in the thread and no response, he has also ceased to invite me to lunch?

You muthufuckin cop haters have made Matt hate me!