Garland SWAT get 3 dogs in one raid

[Hobie]

Garland is a shit hole and Garland cops are known to be aggressive. Nearly every dfwstanger I've bought/sold parts from in Garland was an idiot too. Do not want to be there for anything. If I go to Garland in the future and stupid shit happens to me, I know better, I deserve it. Fuck that place.

Once when I lived near Austin I was hanging out with a friend and her girlfriends visiting from Dallas.

One of the girls loses her ID and credit cards. We go back to the bar, they aren't there. The drunk woman loses it and starts crying. Everyone is telling her it's no big deal and she says "You don't understand, my husband is a cop, a GARLAND cop! He's going to kick my ass."

LOL

Again, fuck that place.

[racrguy]

NSFW LANGUAGE

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysajIKG1uOA&feature=g-u-u[/ame]

[stevo]

The funny thing is I'm not required to point out the common place. If you can't figure it out, then tough shit.

Typical pussy move...

Stevo

[Forever_frost]

Man, you are delusional if you believe what you typed.

Explain my delusion

Hai gais!

Not this fuckin' a-hole.

I guess it's just too convenient for you to skip over anything logical and reasonable to take a jab or make an insult.

But keep it up, I'm sure you being filled with hatred will catch up to you someday.

That actually was a reasonable post. I had to clutch my chest when I originally saw the author.

[Osiris]

Hai gais!

[03trubluGT]

Initially dogs, however you made the leap of one dog being representative of all dogs which means that anytime a cop feels 'threatened' (dog hiding in a corner and cop just wanting to get his gun off) he is justified in shooting. If you can extrapolate the actions of all dogs from the action of one, then the actions of all cops can be extrapolated by the actions of one.

Guess which one I'm more worried about day to day. A strange dog attacking me, or a cop getting the address wrong and shooting my dog, kicking in my door and shooting my family

Man, you are delusional if you believe what you typed.

[Forever_frost]

Let me make sure we are talking about the same thing.

Dogs were shot here, or was it people????

Initially dogs, however you made the leap of one dog being representative of all dogs which means that anytime a cop feels 'threatened' (dog hiding in a corner and cop just wanting to get his gun off) he is justified in shooting. If you can extrapolate the actions of all dogs from the action of one, then the actions of all cops can be extrapolated by the actions of one.

Guess which one I'm more worried about day to day. A strange dog attacking me, or a cop getting the address wrong and shooting my dog, kicking in my door and shooting my family

[03trubluGT]

Examples of you being reasonable?

There needs to be an overhaul of the entire policing system, but there is a few downfalls to a "one size fits all" police standard.

I can tell you the first people that would scream is the ACLU.

They are afraid of a national police force, it would reek of big brother on roids.

If there was a national standard for policing, I'm sure there would be some federal liability and the feds don't want that.

Back on topic.

You guys have no clue what goes into a dog shooting. They are classified as "CPI" (Critical Police Incidents) and the last one I did where the officer was attacked he shot at and missed the dog. The dog decided he didn't want to eat the officer after the loud bang and ran.

I still have to do a complete supervisory investigation which entails calling Crime Scene out to do a detailed scale diagram of the scene. It ends up being about a 35 page report.

Trust me, every one of my peeps know what goes into a CPI, and how I dislike them. If there is an option, they are to exercise it. I don't like killing dogs, but there are times that it is justified (no, and not just because a dog barks at someone).

Animal Control has even put out a slide show presentation on the true signs of aggression of dogs. I've held documented training on it to reduce these kinds of incidents.

Guys, the short answer is I don't have a answer that will fit every scenario. The span of control I have is all I can do, and I don't like seeing this any more than any of you do.

I guess it's just too convenient for you to skip over anything logical and reasonable to take a jab or make an insult.

But keep it up, I'm sure you being filled with hatred will catch up to you someday.

[unkoricky]

Dickwads?


Why the name calling? That so juvenile........................

We are just trying to have a conversation.












(sarcasm)

I can be as reasonable as can be and these dickwads will still enjoy taking illogical jabs.

Examples of you being reasonable?

[03trubluGT]

The confinement? Yes. They don't put you on a desk if you shoot up the wrong house. You get IMMEDIATELY pulled from your team and put on lock down. I'm sure you know how the system works as I'm sure you have been in a fire team in combat ops, which is why I'm rather confused as to why you are misstating what happens when you open fire on civilians in the military.

Hell, we don't even have the luxury of civilian trials. We have TRIBUNALS. And before you even get there, your team leader and platoon Sargent evaluates you. You become a hazard as that action could have turned an entire country against our forces (as we've seen).

Let me make sure we are talking about the same thing.

Dogs were shot here, or was it people????

[Forever_frost]

So all this happens immediately? I had office hours for insubordination to a boot LT and I didn't get any confinement or suspended pay until after the office hours was held. Don't give me that bullshit you're trying to feed me, I know how the system works.

The confinement? Yes. They don't put you on a desk if you shoot up the wrong house. You get IMMEDIATELY pulled from your team and put on lock down. I'm sure you know how the system works as I'm sure you have been in a fire team in combat ops, which is why I'm rather confused as to why you are misstating what happens when you open fire on civilians in the military.

Hell, we don't even have the luxury of civilian trials. We have TRIBUNALS. And before you even get there, your team leader and platoon Sargent evaluates you. You become a hazard as that action could have turned an entire country against our forces (as we've seen).

[03trubluGT]

Good post. Sounds like there are reasonible investigations into this to me.
Let me move out of the way now so other posters can come in here and try to railroad you.
There's always going to be some idiot on the force, just like any other job. You can't account for everything. I hate the cops as much as the next guy but you know it's got to be annoying when your daily job involves a dog trying to maul you ON TOP of why you're there for in the first place.

It's not like every ATF douche shots himself in the foot because there is a video on the internet of it.

I can be as reasonable as can be and these dickwads will still enjoy taking illogical jabs.