Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Washington named Britains all time greatest adversary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    What happened here? Did it move to PMs? It was just getting good!

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Ratt View Post
      What happened here? Did it move to PMs? It was just getting good!
      No kidding, it was turning into a real "nail" biter.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by idrivea4banger View Post
        This thread has gone to shit, Britain has won this round.
        Truism! Our forefathers would shit their collective pants. LOL!

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Jesus Christ View Post
          No kidding, it was turning into a real "nail" biter.
          Since it was more of a catfight, consider "claw" biter

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by The King View Post
            Since it was more of a catfight, consider "claw" biter
            wrong kind of nail

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Craizie View Post
              Very Christian like.
              That's what you chose to use? I figured you would've been more bent on the beating in the name of Jesus. I said I am Christian. Never said I was perfect therefore no need for some self-righteous pompous ass judging my actions.
              Originally posted by racrguy View Post
              I expect nothing less.
              Hush up, bitch. When I want your girly opinion I'll slap it out of you.

              Originally posted by Silverback View Post
              wrong kind of nail
              You too you greasy fat fuck. Suck down another cheeseburger and cigarette and talk shit from behind a keyboard like you are something to be reckoned.

              Originally posted by Ratt View Post
              Fuck you, you drunk bald bastard. Shouldn't you be banging some Hooters waitress right about now?
              I think Steve sells bipolar meds on the side. You should look him up.
              Last edited by SS Junk; 04-17-2012, 07:01 PM.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Silverback View Post
                wrong kind of nail
                Only if you take sarcasm seriously

                Comment


                • #83
                  I think the Brit's deserve some props for giving Washington his due.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View Post
                    I think the Brit's deserve some props for giving Washington his due.
                    I heard he just got lucky (and doesn't take Christmas off).

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by racrguy View Post
                      Yet those same founding fathers, in the constitution, only mention religion in order to limit it. Look at you, talking out of your ass because you've got no clue what you're talking about. I imagine if knowledge was a baseball bat, Broncojohnny and crew would've missed you every time. Alas it seems they've merely beaten you more stupid than you already were.
                      I enjoy reading your responses in this thread, but I would have to disagree with you on this one..

                      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
                      The US Constitution, by it's very nature is meant to limit Government by saying what powers it has and doesn't have. The third article of the 1st amendment specifically says that government cannot create a religion or stop others from practicing their religion.

                      This is why we don't have teacher led prayer in schools. It isn't that the Constitution prevents prayer, it is that the teacher is an agent of the government and thus cannot lead prayer because it represents a government endorsement of religious belief. That kind of action can even be an enforcement of religion since a teacher is an authority figure in a school..

                      If the Constitution were to actually put a limit on religion, then the feds would have the ability to tell us who or what we can or cannot worship. Even though I'm a Christian (and an admitted flawed one at that) I have no desire to have a Theocracy. I can just imagine how bad it could potentially be if Southern Baptists ran things. (feel free to scratch out Southern Baptists and replace it with any other religious sect)

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by SS Junk View Post


                        You too you greasy fat fuck. Suck down another cheeseburger and cigarette and talk shit from behind a keyboard like you are something to be reckoned.
                        That made me laugh.
                        Originally posted by davbrucas
                        I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

                        Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

                        You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View Post
                          I enjoy reading your responses in this thread, but I would have to disagree with you on this one..



                          The US Constitution, by it's very nature is meant to limit Government by saying what powers it has and doesn't have. The third article of the 1st amendment specifically says that government cannot create a religion or stop others from practicing their religion.

                          This is why we don't have teacher led prayer in schools. It isn't that the Constitution prevents prayer, it is that the teacher is an agent of the government and thus cannot lead prayer because it represents a government endorsement of religious belief. That kind of action can even be an enforcement of religion since a teacher is an authority figure in a school..

                          If the Constitution were to actually put a limit on religion, then the feds would have the ability to tell us who or what we can or cannot worship. Even though I'm a Christian (and an admitted flawed one at that) I have no desire to have a Theocracy. I can just imagine how bad it could potentially be if Southern Baptists ran things. (feel free to scratch out Southern Baptists and replace it with any other religious sect)
                          A post worthy of a response!

                          It is also limiting religion, in that it cannot weasel its way into the government (how effective it's been we can obviously see in states like TN and AZ.) How do you think religion came into power in the dark ages? It got intertwined with the government and started creating laws that were religious in nature. By banning such laws from being passed, you are limiting religion. Contrary to some peoples belief, there are still instances to this day that people are fighting (and in some cases succeeding) to inject religion into the government.

                          I don't give two shits if a legislator is religious or not. I take issue when he/she tries to pass laws, morally judge me, or limit my freedoms with the basis of a holy book or the belief in a divine power.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
                            I think Steve sells bipolar meds on the side. You should look him up.
                            Not sure what you mean by that, or wher eyou got the idea that I'm bi-polar.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              ^^^
                              What in God's Holy Name are you talking about? You are all over the place with this nonsensical gibberish that appears to have been parroted by some obscure source and disclose nothing but opinion.

                              I take issue when he/she tries to pass laws, morally judge me, or limit my freedoms with the basis of a holy book or the belief in a divine power.
                              How about listing an example or two...

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                America, FUCK YEAH. Back to Back World War champs, also most fucking awesome country on planet, that all haters are hating. Here in Britain I get looks for being American, I stride that shit with cockiness. I tell them I was Mexican first, but chose to be American, cuz Mexico sucks balls.
                                First hand witness at the failure of public healthcare.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X