Originally posted by 347Mike
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So Zimmerman is charged with 2nd degree murder.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 8mpg View PostMost important update of the Zimmerman case:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/upshot/g...214706403.htmlOriginally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by line-em-up View PostI heard a law expert say that the prosecutor might have charged him with 2nd degree murder with the plan that they would plea bargain down to manslaughter.Originally posted by John -- '02 HAWK View PostFrom what I understand the Jury will also be presented with the manslaughter charge so that they can downgrade if they think he is guilty of the lesser charges but not guilty of the higher charge.
Originally posted by John -- '02 HAWK View PostI really think a prosecutor will have a hard time proving that Zimmerman was willing/wanting to kill someone especially when zimmerman defended himself once they went to the ground. But I believe the prosecutor will be able to prove that zimmerman was negligent in his actions and created the situation the lead to martin's death.Men have become the tools of their tools.
-Henry David Thoreau
Comment
-
Originally posted by kbscobravert View PostI wonder if we can donate money to his books.
If you want to write him his address is:
George Zimmerman
#201200004452
211 Bush Blvd
Sanford, FL 32773
I am sure that he could use a few words of encouragement right now.Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
Comment
-
Interesting, in the lawyers press conference video, starting at about the 20 minute mark, they lay out that z DID stop following, went back to the front to get an address, and t came from the other end to the front and accosted z, asking if he had a problem with him, z said no, t said you do now. That's evidently on the 911 tape.
Then the affidavit is evidently trying to say that the stand your ground law is not applicable because z started the altercation by beginning to follow t, thus it is his fault t came around and confronted him. This is how they are trying to beat the evidence, by suppressing the SYG law on this ground.
They (the prosecution) are going to lose this case.
Comment
Comment