Score one for the citizenry.

[jluv]

It isn't.

Damn straight.

[03trubluGT]

Figures.

Eat crow.

http://www.dfwmustangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=564998&postcount=23

Yes, that was posted 1/23/12 at 9:48 pm.


And for the bonus:

http://www.dfwmustangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=565035&postcount=26

[03trubluGT]

But it has happened before.

So you're okay with it happening as long as:

you don't cause it
it doesn't happen to you
it doesn't happen to anyone who lives next to you


gotcha

The chances are better of you getting hit by lightning, unless you are the target of a federal investigation.

Are you?

I'm about as worried of this as I am concerned that questionable tactics are used for interrogating terrorists.

[03trubluGT]

The illegal act (illegal search and seizure) was them placing the device onto the personal property (the vehicle). It matters not where the vehicle was located when they placed it, it was the act of placing it onto the vehicle without a warrant which is against the 4th Amendment.

Stevo

Ok, how do you feel about an active tail?

Or using aircraft or satellites to track someone?

That seems to be perfectly legal according to this opinion.

So what you are saying is that you'd rather waste $50,000 of taxpayer's money to track someone, or a $100 tool?

[sc281]

The chances are better of you getting hit by lightning, unless you are the target of a federal investigation.

Are you?

I'm about as worried of this as I am concerned that questionable tactics are used for interrogating terrorists.

So individual rights matter only when it's YOUR head in the noose..

Good to know.

[talisman]

Eat crow.

http://www.dfwmustangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=564998&postcount=23

Yes, that was posted 1/23/12 at 9:48 pm.


And for the bonus:

http://www.dfwmustangs.net/forums/sh...5&postcount=26

Dude, who gives a shit? I've told you this before, and you don't listen. All you do in these threads is paint the police in a NEGATIVE light by seasawing all over the place and being vague with your convictions. If thats your aim, then by all means keep at it. You're doing an excellent job. Personally, I find it disturbing.

[03trubluGT]

Dude, who gives a shit? I've told you this before, and you don't listen. All you do in these threads is paint the police in a NEGATIVE light by seasawing all over the place and being vague with your convictions. If thats your aim, then by all means keep at it. You're doing an excellent job. Personally, I find it disturbing.

Now it's "who gives a shit?"

A few posts ago you were giving a shit when you posted:

"Maybe you waylaid that argument later in this thread, but your other posts that I'm addressing are the ones that seem to think tracking people without a warrant, or consent, is perfectly reasonable(because it doesn't affect "anyone").

How about we just cut out all the bullshit and get right to it. Do you honestly think that tracking should be allowed without a probable cause issued warrant? Because if you don't, I don't see what you're trying to prove in here. It's like you're trying to take 4 different arguments, and combine them by flushing them down a toilet. Stick to the topic for once."

Now that I showed you that I have already posted an answer, you are making like it is no big deal.

Is this your way of deflecting when you are wrong?

[03trubluGT]

So individual rights matter only when it's YOUR head in the noose..

Good to know.

What a dumb shit.

I don't stick my head in a noose for it to matter.

Have a good life wearing that tin foil hat.

[talisman]

Now it's "who gives a shit?"

A few posts ago you were giving a shit when you posted:

"Maybe you waylaid that argument later in this thread, but your other posts that I'm addressing are the ones that seem to think tracking people without a warrant, or consent, is perfectly reasonable(because it doesn't affect "anyone").

How about we just cut out all the bullshit and get right to it. Do you honestly think that tracking should be allowed without a probable cause issued warrant? Because if you don't, I don't see what you're trying to prove in here. It's like you're trying to take 4 different arguments, and combine them by flushing them down a toilet. Stick to the topic for once."

Now that I showed you that I have already posted an answer, you are making like it is no big deal.

Is this your way of deflecting when you are wrong?

How am I wrong when I asked a question? Jesus Christ man, seriously.

[sc281]

What a dumb shit.

Whoa Whoa Whoa...

Petty attacks coming from the great protector of the citizen?!? Say it ain't so!

I don't stick my head in a noose for it to matter.

Neither have the many that were unconstitutionally searched and/or seized.

I get it. Innocent until proven guilty, unless the police already "know" you're guilty, then it's okay to violate his constitutional rights to get the bastid! amirite kojak?

Have a good life wearing that tin foil hat.

It'll look good in prison stripes.

[Forever_frost]

There isn't a damn thing I do that could even remotely cause this to happen.

More so, I don't live next to anyone that this could happen to either.

I'm pretty sure the young lady that had the FBI chainsaw through her door felt the same. And the mayor who had the cops bust through his door, shoot his dogs and prone him and his family in the dog blood because someone had used their address to ship drugs.

Don't say it wont' happen to you because of that badge.

[Forever_frost]

Now it's "who gives a shit?"

A few posts ago you were giving a shit when you posted:

"Maybe you waylaid that argument later in this thread, but your other posts that I'm addressing are the ones that seem to think tracking people without a warrant, or consent, is perfectly reasonable(because it doesn't affect "anyone").

How about we just cut out all the bullshit and get right to it. Do you honestly think that tracking should be allowed without a probable cause issued warrant? Because if you don't, I don't see what you're trying to prove in here. It's like you're trying to take 4 different arguments, and combine them by flushing them down a toilet. Stick to the topic for once."

Now that I showed you that I have already posted an answer, you are making like it is no big deal.

Is this your way of deflecting when you are wrong?

I'll answer this for me. If you can't convince a judge that you need to track someone, you shouldn't be doing it. And no, 'confidential informants' who are really crackheads trying to get off don't count.

[line-em-up]

...

Bitching about it does not equal doing something about it.

true

[theminch]

Man, I made a joke about front plates and stopping people around 3 am. Why does everyone get butt hurt when an Leo post something? Has eveyones experience with the police really been that bad?

[mikec]

Man, I made a joke about front plates and stopping people around 3 am. Why does everyone get butt hurt when an Leo post something? Has eveyones experience with the police really been that bad?

Yes. Many realize that the police are abusive of their power, and are resentful of that.

K?