Originally posted by 03trubluGT
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Blogger cries "FTP", then crawfishes....
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostThat would be a streeeetch....
DPD is HORRIBLE. I have old high school friends that are close to retirement, and they are counting the seconds.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ceyko View PostIn fairness, it would be nice if the media covered more positive things. Not just in regards to the police either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostWhite text owns you? FWPD isn't NEAR as bad as DPD is. Obviously I don't speak from an inside perspective, but of one from someone who sees the shenanigans the two departments get into.
Times are a lot different, and you have to look at the hiring process. We are not getting the same applicants as we were 20 years ago. Those questionable applicants are showing their true colors after being trained and cut loose. Sometimes it takes a couple of years to trip up, but it's happening, and it makes us all look bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostI saw the text, that's why I said it was a stretch.
Times are a lot different, and you have to look at the hiring process. We are not getting the same applicants as we were 20 years ago. Those questionable applicants are showing their true colors after being trained and cut loose. Sometimes it takes a couple of years to trip up, but it's happening, and it makes us all look bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostI know you're not a part of the hiring process, but hire smarter people.
A great example is APD where you have to have a degree. They tend to over think everything and worry about policies and procedures. While they are in meditation, opportunities pass. They are also afraid to get their hands dirty.
This is a generalization, not true about evey APD officer. They also have to worry about being "at will" employees and not covered by civil service.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostIt's not "smarter" people, it's people with common sense and integrity. Some of the smartest people I know don't have a lick of common sense. It is truly a homogenous blend of traits that make a good officer.
A great example is APD where you have to have a degree. They tend to over think everything and worry about policies and procedures. While they are in meditation, opportunities pass. They are also afraid to get their hands dirty.
This is a generalization, not true about evey APD officer. They also have to worry about being "at will" employees and not covered by civil service.
Are you guys seeing the results of this whole "can't hire anyone with an IQ over 104" yet? Is that even a policy all the departments are going to?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostI saw the text, that's why I said it was a stretch.
Times are a lot different, and you have to look at the hiring process. We are not getting the same applicants as we were 20 years ago. Those questionable applicants are showing their true colors after being trained and cut loose. Sometimes it takes a couple of years to trip up, but it's happening, and it makes us all look bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostAre you guys seeing the results of this whole "can't hire anyone with an IQ over 104" yet? Is that even a policy all the departments are going to?
That's the most stupid thing I've heard in a long time. I can't believe that that would be a policy anywhere.
If that was in place in 1992, I would have another career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slostang281 View PostI know someone (Diaz, I think) from your dept sent me an email to fill out a recommendation form for a friend of mine and it took over a year for him to get in. Is it really that complicated to get in FWPD?
From some of the newbies I see, I guess not.
The background process in intended to separate the wheat from the chaff, but some of the chaff makes it through anyway.
Comment
Comment