Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blogger cries "FTP", then crawfishes....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    I don't think anything can match the incompetence of the DPD leadership.
    FWPD leadership? Sorry, too easy. I'm just fuckin' with ya.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by racrguy View Post
      FWPD leadership? Sorry, too easy. I'm just fuckin' with ya.
      That would be a streeeetch....

      DPD is HORRIBLE. I have old high school friends that are close to retirement, and they are counting the seconds.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
        That would be a streeeetch....

        DPD is HORRIBLE. I have old high school friends that are close to retirement, and they are counting the seconds.
        White text owns you? FWPD isn't NEAR as bad as DPD is. Obviously I don't speak from an inside perspective, but of one from someone who sees the shenanigans the two departments get into.

        Comment


        • #19
          somebody say shenanigans?

          Can't beat them, Join their NEW message board !!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ceyko View Post
            In fairness, it would be nice if the media covered more positive things. Not just in regards to the police either.
            "Today, a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration – that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There's no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we're the imagination of ourselves. Here's Tom with the weather."

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by racrguy View Post
              White text owns you? FWPD isn't NEAR as bad as DPD is. Obviously I don't speak from an inside perspective, but of one from someone who sees the shenanigans the two departments get into.
              I saw the text, that's why I said it was a stretch.


              Times are a lot different, and you have to look at the hiring process. We are not getting the same applicants as we were 20 years ago. Those questionable applicants are showing their true colors after being trained and cut loose. Sometimes it takes a couple of years to trip up, but it's happening, and it makes us all look bad.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                I saw the text, that's why I said it was a stretch.


                Times are a lot different, and you have to look at the hiring process. We are not getting the same applicants as we were 20 years ago. Those questionable applicants are showing their true colors after being trained and cut loose. Sometimes it takes a couple of years to trip up, but it's happening, and it makes us all look bad.
                I know you're not a part of the hiring process, but hire smarter people.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by talisman View Post
                  Haven't heard the whole story. Wharz video?
                  Art said it would be released once investigation is complete.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by hotrod66stang View Post
                    Art Acevedo is still an incompetent fuck, though. APD under his watch is going to end up like DPD.
                    How so?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by racrguy View Post
                      I know you're not a part of the hiring process, but hire smarter people.
                      It's not "smarter" people, it's people with common sense and integrity. Some of the smartest people I know don't have a lick of common sense. It is truly a homogenous blend of traits that make a good officer.

                      A great example is APD where you have to have a degree. They tend to over think everything and worry about policies and procedures. While they are in meditation, opportunities pass. They are also afraid to get their hands dirty.

                      This is a generalization, not true about evey APD officer. They also have to worry about being "at will" employees and not covered by civil service.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                        It's not "smarter" people, it's people with common sense and integrity. Some of the smartest people I know don't have a lick of common sense. It is truly a homogenous blend of traits that make a good officer.

                        A great example is APD where you have to have a degree. They tend to over think everything and worry about policies and procedures. While they are in meditation, opportunities pass. They are also afraid to get their hands dirty.

                        This is a generalization, not true about evey APD officer. They also have to worry about being "at will" employees and not covered by civil service.

                        Are you guys seeing the results of this whole "can't hire anyone with an IQ over 104" yet? Is that even a policy all the departments are going to?
                        www.allforoneroofing.com

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          ftfbi

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                            I saw the text, that's why I said it was a stretch.


                            Times are a lot different, and you have to look at the hiring process. We are not getting the same applicants as we were 20 years ago. Those questionable applicants are showing their true colors after being trained and cut loose. Sometimes it takes a couple of years to trip up, but it's happening, and it makes us all look bad.
                            I know someone (Diaz, I think) from your dept sent me an email to fill out a recommendation form for a friend of mine and it took over a year for him to get in. Is it really that complicated to get in FWPD?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by mikec View Post
                              Are you guys seeing the results of this whole "can't hire anyone with an IQ over 104" yet? Is that even a policy all the departments are going to?

                              That's the most stupid thing I've heard in a long time. I can't believe that that would be a policy anywhere.

                              If that was in place in 1992, I would have another career.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by slostang281 View Post
                                I know someone (Diaz, I think) from your dept sent me an email to fill out a recommendation form for a friend of mine and it took over a year for him to get in. Is it really that complicated to get in FWPD?

                                From some of the newbies I see, I guess not.


                                The background process in intended to separate the wheat from the chaff, but some of the chaff makes it through anyway.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X