Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

They finally got it right

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I'm mexican!













    I'm mexican!
    Ded

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
      Not everyone that crosses has criminal intentions regardless of what the media feeds you.
      Not surprising that you don't understand this, but when someone crosses the border ILLEGALLY, they do in fact have criminal intentions.
      Originally posted by BradM
      But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
      Originally posted by Leah
      In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
        If the kid was 5 feet away from the Agent and leveling a brick at his head, I'm A-O-K with plugging him...
        OIC, so is there some sort of official object/distance hurled/ object size protocol you follow that justifies lethal and non-lethal force? I'm interested in where you draw the line.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
          OIC, so is there some sort of official object/distance hurled/ object size protocol you follow that justifies lethal and non-lethal force? I'm interested in where you draw the line.
          Draw the line with common sense, is it really that hard?

          320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

          DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by bcoop View Post
            Not surprising that you don't understand this, but when someone crosses the border ILLEGALLY, they do in fact have criminal intentions.
            No shit, I understand that just fine.

            There is a difference in crossing to cross and smuggling drugs, humans and weapons across.

            320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

            DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
              OIC, so is there some sort of official object/distance hurled/ object size protocol you follow that justifies lethal and non-lethal force? I'm interested in where you draw the line.
              Like I said (I'm starting to sound really redundant and you're really coming off like you didn't even read my post which fuels the constant "SS Junk was beaten into retardation by Mike and Al P while Rick Modena sat in the getaway car and laughed at you" crowd), I don't know. I said it right here...

              Originally posted by DonSVO
              I guess my question would be more along the lines of, "how much force is warranted"?
              I can't see by that video if there were more threats (other kids, etc), I can't tell how hard the rock is being thrown, or even where the kid throwing rocks was at in relation to the Agent or the size of the rock. Also, there's a difference between a gangly little punk throwing a golf ball-sized stone and a kid that's been pitching a baseball for 10 years lining you up with a rock the size of his fist. It's definitely an on-spot call... he felt justified in using deadly force.
              Originally posted by PGreenCobra
              I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
              Originally posted by Trip McNeely
              Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
              dont downshift!!
              Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                No shit, I understand that just fine.

                There is a difference in crossing to cross and smuggling drugs, humans and weapons across.
                Both are illegal. I don't care about the reason.
                Originally posted by BradM
                But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                Originally posted by Leah
                In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                  Draw the line with common sense, is it really that hard?
                  Apparently since you are not able to grasp it either...
                  Originally posted by Sean88gt
                  You can take white off the list. White on anything is the best, including vehicles, women, and the Presidency.
                  Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder
                  You can not imagine how difficult it is to hold a half gallon of moo juice and polish the one-eyed gopher when your doin' seventy-five in an eighteen-wheeler.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                    Both are illegal. I don't care about the reason.
                    This.
                    People say "oh its harmless" well you keep thinking that and let's see how long it takes the harmfull people to find out how easy it is to cross.
                    Originally posted by Sean88gt
                    You can take white off the list. White on anything is the best, including vehicles, women, and the Presidency.
                    Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder
                    You can not imagine how difficult it is to hold a half gallon of moo juice and polish the one-eyed gopher when your doin' seventy-five in an eighteen-wheeler.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                      Or you shoot the cartels family and they cross the boarder with real weapons and open fire on innocent bystanders, because the cartels don't give a shit.

                      Honey Badger doesn't give a shit. Anyone sneaking across that border is aware there are consequences.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
                        OIC, so is there some sort of official object/distance hurled/ object size protocol you follow that justifies lethal and non-lethal force? I'm interested in where you draw the line.
                        There is no line, every situation is different, with a dfferent set of mitigating circumstances. Lethal force should only be used to prevent lethal actions, or actions intended to cause grave bodily harm. A kid throwing rocks is not justification for using a firearm.


                        Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                        Both are illegal. I don't care about the reason.
                        So running a stop sign and murder should both get the death penalty? The punishment should fit the crime, c'mon Brent.


                        Originally posted by Gtracer View Post
                        This.
                        People say "oh its harmless" well you keep thinking that and let's see how long it takes the harmfull people to find out how easy it is to cross.
                        Harmfull people have been crossing the border for decades, easy or not. Shooting one kid isn't going to affect that one iota.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Big A View Post

                          So running a stop sign and murder should both get the death penalty? The punishment should fit the crime, c'mon
                          I didn't say that. The kid broke the law. Period. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
                          Originally posted by BradM
                          But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                          Originally posted by Leah
                          In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by vadertt View Post
                            I'm mexican!













                            I'm mexican!

                            Where's my taco?????!!?!
                            Originally posted by talisman
                            I wonder if there will be a new character that specializes in bjj and passive agressive comebacks?
                            Originally posted by AdamLX
                            If there was, I wouldn't pick it because it would probably just keep leaving the game and then coming back like nothing happened.
                            Originally posted by Broncojohnny
                            Because fuck you, that's why
                            Originally posted by 80coupe
                            nice dick, Idrivea4banger
                            Originally posted by Rick Modena
                            ......and idrivea4banger is a real person.
                            Originally posted by Jester
                            Man ive always wanted to smoke a bowl with you. Just seem like a cool cat.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
                              I can't see by that video if there were more threats (other kids, etc), I can't tell how hard the rock is being thrown, or even where the kid throwing rocks was at in relation to the Agent or the size of the rock. Also, there's a difference between a gangly little punk throwing a golf ball-sized stone and a kid that's been pitching a baseball for 10 years lining you up with a rock the size of his fist. It's definitely an on-spot call... he felt justified in using deadly force.
                              So what are we talking here... Say a gangly kid has a rock the size of a baseball and throws it at agent at... let's say... 23.746032' away? Would it still be justified? How about if rock star Mexican baseball player throws a golfball sized stone with his non-dominant hand at say... 3 metres away? Is killing him then justified? Wait.. Let's say a 123lb Mexican crackhead with, not a five foot pipe bender, but a TEN foot pipe bender was standing 9.785' away and did a check swing while the other two already mentioned perps threw their rocks, but let's say they were double the distance away? Could the agent blow all three of them away???
                              Would you be cool if I were standing 20 fathoms away and heaved a cricket sized rock at such an angle to where it would come straight down on your head before you shot me? So many instances!!111

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
                                So what are we talking here... Say a gangly kid has a rock the size of a baseball and throws it at agent at... let's say... 23.746032' away? Would it still be justified? How about if rock star Mexican baseball player throws a golfball sized stone with his non-dominant hand at say... 3 metres away? Is killing him then justified? Wait.. Let's say a 123lb Mexican crackhead with, not a five foot pipe bender, but a TEN foot pipe bender was standing 9.785' away and did a check swing while the other two already mentioned perps threw their rocks, but let's say they were double the distance away? Could the agent blow all three of them away???
                                Would you be cool if I were standing 20 fathoms away and heaved a cricket sized rock at such an angle to where it would come straight down on your head before you shot me? So many instances!!111
                                Smoke weed er' day.

                                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X