Long story short:
Moved in 1/4/2010. Noted on my check in sheet that there were various stains on the carpet before moving in (so carpet was not replaced.) I lived there until 12/31/2011, so 2 years. Wife had a dog, we paid pet rent, and he DID pee on the carpet and fuck it up... not disputing that. They sent me a bill for $1015.88 to replace the carpet. My issue with this is that it wasn't replaced when I moved in, I lived on it for 2 years, and despite the pet stains, they would have HAD to replace it anyways just due to wear & tear. I told them I have no problem paying some of it, but don't think its fair to have to pay for ALL of it since they would have had to replace it regardless of if I had a pet or not. They of course took my $200 pet deposit as well, which I expected.
Am I just way out of line for thinking this?
Moved in 1/4/2010. Noted on my check in sheet that there were various stains on the carpet before moving in (so carpet was not replaced.) I lived there until 12/31/2011, so 2 years. Wife had a dog, we paid pet rent, and he DID pee on the carpet and fuck it up... not disputing that. They sent me a bill for $1015.88 to replace the carpet. My issue with this is that it wasn't replaced when I moved in, I lived on it for 2 years, and despite the pet stains, they would have HAD to replace it anyways just due to wear & tear. I told them I have no problem paying some of it, but don't think its fair to have to pay for ALL of it since they would have had to replace it regardless of if I had a pet or not. They of course took my $200 pet deposit as well, which I expected.
Am I just way out of line for thinking this?
Comment