Mods/Admins: Who is posting the "mikecwantsdickpics" tag? Second thread I've seen it in and am curious.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"No refusal weekend"
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by The King View PostMust be bothering you a lot, so whoever posted that tag gets my stamp of approval.
Originally posted by vadertt View PostMaybe it's a different "mikec"?
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostNot really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is. And I could careless about your approval, as you are commonly regarded as a bottom feeder.
Look out chickenshit tagger, whoever you are.....mikec is on your ass!
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostNot really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is.Token Split Tail
Originally posted by slow99Lmao...my favorite female poster strikes again.Originally posted by Pokulski-BlatzYou are a moron .... you were fucking with the most powerful vagina on DFW(MU)stangs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostNot really. Just wondering who the passive/aggressive chickenshit is. And I could careless about your approval, as you are commonly regarded as a bottom feeder.
Possible.
Also, "care less" is two words.
Comment
-
I have yet to make a DWI arrest based on SFST evidence only to have them pass the breathalyzer/blood draw. In fact the closest to the legal limit I have personally arrested on was .104, I think.
The no refusal warrants are just that, a search warrant signed by a judge. If a judge signs the warrant blindly, without the required PC, then the warrant will get thrown out. However, I don't see a judge risking his career on a Class B.
Knowing what I know now, if I was pulled over for DWI by one of these dirty, constitution stomping, jack booted thugs ya'll speak of I would gladly do the SFSTs. If he decided I was intoxicated the first thing out of my mouth would be a request for a breathalyzer/blood draw. If you have not been drinking or taking drugs the blood draw will obviously prove it. The breathalyzer will not detect any drugs.
Pretty easy. When the breathalyzer shows .000 its pretty hard to argue that you are under the influence of alcohol. If they want to say they suspect it is some type of drug then a blood test is the only way to prove it.2007 Chevy TBSS
Comment
-
-
23 suspected DWI arrests in FW on New Years.
One even happened to be an 18 year old kid that ran into someone's house and hit the bed they were asleep in.HD Parts
paul@maverickhd.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by JamisonFRC View PostI have yet to make a DWI arrest based on SFST evidence only to have them pass the breathalyzer/blood draw. In fact the closest to the legal limit I have personally arrested on was .104, I think.
The no refusal warrants are just that, a search warrant signed by a judge. If a judge signs the warrant blindly, without the required PC, then the warrant will get thrown out. However, I don't see a judge risking his career on a Class B.
Knowing what I know now, if I was pulled over for DWI by one of these dirty, constitution stomping, jack booted thugs ya'll speak of I would gladly do the SFSTs. If he decided I was intoxicated the first thing out of my mouth would be a request for a breathalyzer/blood draw. If you have not been drinking or taking drugs the blood draw will obviously prove it. The breathalyzer will not detect any drugs.
Pretty easy. When the breathalyzer shows .000 its pretty hard to argue that you are under the influence of alcohol. If they want to say they suspect it is some type of drug then a blood test is the only way to prove it.
Comment
-
Comment