You see, my friends,

[Cooter]

I didn't say that, but look how well anarchy works in fly-bitten African countries.

Stevo

unarmed, uneducated populace

[dcs13]

unarmed, uneducated populace

Perhaps you should read Pat Buchanan's new book. He pretty much hit it on the head...Do you need cliff's notes or have you heard of his concept...

[Denny]

unarmed, uneducated populace

The way I see it; there are a lot more of the easier/softer targets for shitbags to go after once the SHTF. They are obviously too lazy to set themselves up for self-sufficient living, so they'd probably go for something that took less risk and work.

Although, I do expect to have to set some examples. Hopefully, others will learn.

[Denny]

Perhaps you should read Pat Buchanan's new book. He pretty much hit it on the head...Do you need cliff's notes or have you heard of his concept...

LMFAO!!!

You better listen to people that have experienced people and lifestyles in the abscence of a structured government over an old, racist coot.

Are you talking about “Suicide Of A Superpower,” or "Death of the West?"

[Cooter]

meanwhile, I'm not calling for anarchy. I'm calling for restoring our nation to adhere to the constitution

[Denny]

Just maintain a defensive posture.

[dcs13]

Death of the west is his latest. Pretty much sums up the mess we have...We have Sharia law in place in communities WITHIN the US. The liberals are becoming the majority. They're gonna "legally" impose European socialism by being the majority. We're at the tipping point NOW. The election of Barry Hussein Obama was the first shot over the bow so to speak...

[Cooter]

Death of the west is his latest. Pretty much sums up the mess we have...We have Sharia law in place in communities WITHIN the US. The liberals are becoming the majority. They're gonna "legally" impose European socialism by being the majority. We're at the tipping point NOW. The election of Barry Hussein Obama was the first shot over the bow so to speak...

It's a brave new world for sure

[03trubluGT]

While I do agree, laws aren't inacted for those of us with a good sense of morality and and what is right and just, they are enacted to protect us from those that possess neither trait.

That is a complete over-simplification of course, but the reality is that laws are necessary. I wouldn't want to live in a society with no laws or the enforcement thereof.

I was reading through the thread and had to stop due to my agreement with this. Rules are made for those that either don't have the intelligence/common sense, or those that don't have the self control to stay in the boundaries.

[talisman]

Perhaps you should read Pat Buchanan's new book. He pretty much hit it on the head...Do you need cliff's notes or have you heard of his concept...

Pat Buchanan? Ye fucking gods, you've got to be shitting me.

Without laws and repercussions it would be anarchy. I rather not be forced to live where my family is at the mercy of troops of 'katrina victims' running rampant.You cannot kill them all, numbers win, and stupidity breeds faster and is easily controlled.

Stevo

Stupidity wouldn't breed nearly as fast when those government checks stopped rolling in as a "bonus" to hoodrats having a more fuck trophies.

I was reading through the thread and had to stop due to my agreement with this. Rules are made for those that either don't have the intelligence/common sense, or those that don't have the self control to stay in the boundaries.

Defining boundaries limits individualism. There is no set amount of boundaries that applies to every single person in this nation. This goes back to catering to the lowest common denominator rather than just enforcing personal responsibility. We're punishing people for for "crimes" before they've actually commited them. That is not a free society, no matter how you slice it.

[Cooter]

Pat Buchanan? Ye fucking gods, you've got to be shitting me.



Stupidity wouldn't breed nearly as fast when those government checks stopped rolling in as a "bonus" to hoodrats having a more fuck trophies.



Defining boundaries limits individualism. There is no set amount of boundaries that applies to every single person in this nation. This goes back to catering to the lowest common denominator rather than just enforcing personal responsibility. We're punishing people for for "crimes" before they've actually commited them. That is not a free society, no matter how you slice it.

exactly, let's weigh ourselves down with those who are drains on society and encourage them to breed

[racrguy]

Cooter and Talisman.



I don't need speed limits to tell me how fast the maximum safe speed is for me to drive, I don't need curfews to tell me when I have to be home. I don't need the police to come to my house and attempt to force my evacuation. Why are people not allowed to have complete control over their lives and deal with the consequences accordingly? If I don't wear a seatbelt, I may go through a window in the event of a crash. It's a choice I make, it's a consequence I may have to deal with. Is it so difficult for a majority of the populace to pull their head out of their ass, recognize their limits, and not exceed them?

[03trubluGT]

Defining boundaries limits individualism. There is no set amount of boundaries that applies to every single person in this nation. This goes back to catering to the lowest common denominator rather than just enforcing personal responsibility. We're punishing people for for "crimes" before they've actually commited them. That is not a free society, no matter how you slice it.

People in charge have found the "shotgun effect" an easier way to muddle through supervision.

[03trubluGT]

I don't need speed limits to tell me how fast the maximum safe speed is for me to drive, I don't need curfews to tell me when I have to be home. I don't need the police to come to my house and attempt to force my evacuation. Why are people not allowed to have complete control over their lives and deal with the consequences accordingly? If I don't wear a seatbelt, I may go through a window in the event of a crash. It's a choice I make, it's a consequence I may have to deal with. Is it so difficult for a majority of the populace to pull their head out of their ass, recognize their limits, and not exceed them?

Fatality accidents are a major issue with teen driving. They think they are invincible and don't adhere to the rules. Just a couple of weeks ago a teen was killed in an accident on 360 south of I20 as a result of being ejected from a Lexus SUV.

As a parent, how would you like to get the call that your child was killed because they weren't wearing a simple thing like a seatbelt?

[10sec302]

horse shit... you quit taking money from hard working, moral people and paying people to pump out inbred future-convicts... you make it legal to kill for any sort of theft... you kill or excommunicate every treasonous politician who has spit on the constitution they swore to uphold...

it'll get a lot better awful quick

Wrong...

So you're saying that only hard working moral people would only kill inbred/trash, etc and not the other way around ?

You'd have hard working/moral people getting shot for simple things like their wallet, personal items, etc. It would literally be hell on earth.