Navy Fed CU here...way better than any major bank I've ever had dealings with.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BOFA to charge $5 a month for check card use
Collapse
X
-
Here is a golden story, Congress writes up some new legislation that interferes with banking and then blames the banks when they have to charge customers rather than merchants to make their debit card service profitable. I wonder if Derbin even thought about "people voting with their feet" before participating in the crafting of the Dodd-Frank legislation? It is such a free market concept that I doubt he did, he was probably too busy trying to figure out a way to get votes.
Fucking moron.
Sen. Durbin Blasts Bank Of America On $5 Debit-Card Fee >BAC
Oct 3, 2011 15:55:56 (ET)
By Alan Zibel
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--A top Senate lawmaker on Monday sharply criticized Bank of America Corp. (BAC)'s decision to charge customers a $5 monthly fee for making debit-card purchases.
Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.) took to the Senate floor to denounce the Charlotte, N.C.- based bank, which said last week it plans to start collecting the fees. Durbin urged Bank of America's customers to "vote with your feet. Get the heck out of that bank."
The fees, scheduled to start next year, are designed to make up revenue lost due to new federal limits on so-called "swipe fees." Those limits were mandated by a provision authored by Durbin that was incorporated in last year's Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law.
Bank of America customers should find "a bank or credit union that won't gouge for five dollars a month and still will give you a debit card that you can use every single day," Durbin said.
The new caps affect fees merchants pay when a customer uses a debit card at their stores. In June, the Federal Reserve Board finalized rules capping such fees at 24 cents a transaction, compared with a current average of 44 cents.
However, Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.) called the debit-card fee "the first of many consequences" of new regulations imposed by the Dodd-Frank law. He decried the debit-card fee regulations as an unnecessary government intrusion into the market. "Unfortunately consumers across our country are going to be paying the price," Corker said.
The fee will apply to many customers during any month they use their debit card to make a purchase. It won't apply to customers who don't use their debit card to make a purchase or who use it only for ATM transactions.
Industrywide, the caps, which apply to banks with $10 billion and more in assets, could wipe out $6.6 billion in annual revenue for banks, according to an August report from Javelin Strategy and Research.
-By Alan Zibel, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9263; alan.zibel@dowjones.comOriginally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
You should all consider that a lot of predatory fees were completely shut down with the CCA.
Overall i think the consumer got a little protection. In the end, like all regulation, it will present its challenges and shifts in the corporate paradigm.
This particular issue is due to a part of the infrastructure that is being shifted to the consumer. That will change eventually as it becomes a new way of undercutting competition, by absorbing the infrastructure costs and reducing them simultaneously.
It will eventually lead to much more convenient use of unused technology. The ability to implant a microchip in someone, and immediately apply their government ration of grocery subsidies, unemployment and underemployment subsidies, inability to work because you are too lazy subsidies and everything else will be real-time, and when you go to get a pack of government smokes you will just wave your hand in front of the scanner and your account will be billed, no fees!
The future looks so bright we should all be wearing blindfolds...
Comment
-
Originally posted by 347Mike View PostIf anything it will help me. I will use my credit card for all purchases. This doesn't apply with bill pay though, or does it?
Just a guess from a fellow B of A customer, I have no direct knowledge."A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."
-Gerald Ford/Thomas Jefferson
Comment
-
Originally posted by slow06 View PostIf you are talking about paying through B of A's online bill pay I don't think it would since that wouldn't involve your Debit Card. If you are paying a bill on AT&T's website with your Debit Card, I would say you would be charged.
Just a guess from a fellow B of A customer, I have no direct knowledge.
If you use your card to buy online or have it set for an auto draft (like TollTag) then you would be charged.
If at anytime the card number is being used for anything other than an ATM charge, you get a monthly charge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostHere is a golden story, Congress writes up some new legislation that interferes with banking and then blames the banks when they have to charge customers rather than merchants to make their debit card service profitable. I wonder if Derbin even thought about "people voting with their feet" before participating in the crafting of the Dodd-Frank legislation? It is such a free market concept that I doubt he did, he was probably too busy trying to figure out a way to get votes.
Fucking moron.
Not sure what they expected...action, reaction, rinse wash repeat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Denny View PostI wonder how willing they will be to work off a lower pay-off for a BofA or Countrywide loan about now.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FreightTrain View PostI love it when people bitch about the banks charging over draft fees. It's their own damn fault. My sister works at a bank and says some people will pay hundreds of dollars a month in over draft fees. They are that bad managing their money.
Or else her bank is about to have some serious problems with the SEC, and they work on volume of the catch, not the size of the fish...
edit: I just thought of a scenario where that could be the case, and you are correct, it would take someone REALLY crappy at finance to end up in this situation.Last edited by Bassics; 10-04-2011, 10:03 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bassics View PostYou should all consider that a lot of predatory fees were completely shut down with the CCA.
Overall i think the consumer got a little protection. In the end, like all regulation, it will present its challenges and shifts in the corporate paradigm.
This particular issue is due to a part of the infrastructure that is being shifted to the consumer. That will change eventually as it becomes a new way of undercutting competition, by absorbing the infrastructure costs and reducing them simultaneously.
It will eventually lead to much more convenient use of unused technology. The ability to implant a microchip in someone, and immediately apply their government ration of grocery subsidies, unemployment and underemployment subsidies, inability to work because you are too lazy subsidies and everything else will be real-time, and when you go to get a pack of government smokes you will just wave your hand in front of the scanner and your account will be billed, no fees!
The future looks so bright we should all be wearing blindfolds...
Comment
-
Originally posted by EW View PostYou mean predatory like when you pay late they add a fee that you agreed to when you signed up for the card? Fees should be paid by customers not merchants. Reward programs should be paid by the bank offering them not the merchants. Customers that pay on time and as agreed should have lower fees and rates than people who do not pay as agreed.
BUt absolutely some people bitch about a fee just because they didn't think to look and see that that fee has been deducted every month since they opened the card, or they exceeded an introductory period, or whatever. Yes, this is a shift of costs, and like you I agree the fees for account maintenace are either a customer's responsibility to meet or else the bank's responsibility to waive as a promotional offer. Merchants should not be saddled with collecting fees for something that they have no control over.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Denny View PostMore like the talk of many people pulling their accounts and closing out their BofA CCs.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
Comment