Mustangs and Muscle cars

[78X]

They look like shit, designed like shit. To me its old school or nothing.

Your woman looks like shit your taste fucking sucks

[SamTex]

You should get started on a project lawnmower and a project dumpster..

[Big A]

Thats our lil toy we're working on.
We have a shell for a '67 that were building from the ground up later on. One project at a time

Good looking car, and exactly what I'm talking about.

[talisman]

You realize it's "Memento Mori," right?

[Badass2000GT]

theres my boobs...
But how do you know that i have boobs. I could have just had the surgery to have my penis removed and go a vagina and now trying to grow my boobs with pills or save money for a boob job...

You're an fucking idiot.

[Vertnut]

I grew up driving/owning most of the "muscle cars", among them were 454's, 427's, 428 and 429 CJ's. Truth be known, a new 5.0 Mustang or Corvette would kill about anything I ever owned, and they actually STOP, have cold AC, and turn a helluva lot better, too.

Looks...maybe, but the overall performance isn't even close.

[Momentomoir]

You should get started on a project lawnmower and a project dumpster..

Not my land. I just rent here. Landlord just took care of the lawn

Your woman looks like shit your taste fucking sucks

My woman, you assume i have one how nice

Good looking car, and exactly what I'm talking about.

I just wish i didnt have to wait on parts.

[Vertnut]

Someone can't let go of the past...

Unless your definition of muscle car is strictly about looks. Muscle cars these days are superior in just about all ways.

That's the "older we get, the better we were" syndrome.

[BLAKE]

For me personally, If I had $40k to spend on a toy, I'd buy a '66-'67, and build it up.

66 & 67 are two different body styles and it would have to be either super-rare, or use some really expensive parts and paint to cost $40K.

ok then pony cars and muscle cars. does that make you happy?

You also showed a Corvette, which is neither pony, nor muscle.

I would rather have the cars that we have now than what we've had in the last 30 years before this age of modern RWD 400+ HP from the big 3.

80's was light, fun to drive rattle traps from Ford and GM, 90's was more refined from those two but basically more of the same. Now we have pretty bad ass offerings from all three and they're faster, more reliable, and more comfortable than ever. Knowing that styling will never be like the mid-late 60's again, I'd say things are pretty good now.

[Momentomoir]

I grew up driving/owning most of the "muscle cars", among them were 454's, 427's, 428 and 429 CJ's. Truth be known, a new 5.0 Mustang or Corvette would kill about anything I ever owned, and they actually STOP, have cold AC, and turn a helluva lot better, too.

Looks...maybe, but the overall performance isn't even close.

Ac, turning and breaks can be simply fixed with a little effort. Those can all be changed

[Vertnut]

Not my land. I just rent here. Landlord just took care of the lawn

My woman, you assume i have one how nice

I just wish i didnt have to wait on parts.

You have a lot to change out on that '68, with it being a 6 cyl car.

[BLAKE]

Good looking car, and exactly what I'm talking about.

If you want a coupe, you damn sure don't need $40K.

[Momentomoir]

66 & 67 are two different body styles and it would have to be either super-rare, or use some really expensive parts and paint to cost $40K.

I think they might be talking about $40k to drop into a 66 or 67. Like buying body and so forth. Thats why they said building up.

[Vertnut]

Ac, turning and breaks can be simply fixed with a little effort. Those can all be changed

Little effort...and a shit-load of money.

[Momentomoir]

You have a lot to change out on that '68, with it being a 6 cyl car.

The '68 is a restore project nothing to race. The '67 with be the one we restore for racing.