Can we haz it mainstream soon?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
wireless electricity
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Beej View PostTesla had it right but politics and Edison kept him down. If we would have followed the path of genius we would probably be in a different place today.
I know that one of the phone companies had a phone that charged wirelessly. I will have to look it up since it has been so long since I saw the story.
Just imagine the world though. You wouldn't need to relocate plugs in your house. You could place electronic items where ever you wanted. I think it would be kick ass.Last edited by mstng86; 08-29-2011, 07:38 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beej View PostTesla had it right but politics and Edison kept him down. If we would have followed the path of genius we would probably be in a different place today.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mstng86 View PostJust imagine the world though. You wouldn't need to relocate plugs in your house. You could place electronic items where ever you wanted. I think it would be kick ass.
Think bigger.
How about electric cars that could run indefinitely without needing to recharge. Trains that could do the same...
You could pretty much relegate the internal combustion engine to history books.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strychnine View PostThink bigger.
How about electric cars that could run indefinitely without needing to recharge. Trains that could do the same...
You could pretty much relegate the internal combustion engine to history books.
Comment
-
-
I'm not sure anyone held Tesla down. We use A/C power and radio controls everywhere. The difference is Tesla gave away all his patents and chose not to profit off them where Edison made some money. From what i understand wireless electricity would not work well due to air is a very poor conductor (and unpredictable see lightning) there is just too much energy wasted in transmission to be economical same reason we didn't use DC power for our homes.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by psdtech View PostI'm not sure anyone held Tesla down. We use A/C power and radio controls everywhere. The difference is Tesla gave away all his patents and chose not to profit off them where Edison made some money. From what i understand wireless electricity would not work well due to air is a very poor conductor (and unpredictable see lightning) there is just too much energy wasted in transmission to be economical same reason we didn't use DC power for our homes.
Comment
-
Almost here actually. There was an article about a year ago where they were going to release the technology. The first step was the inductive charging mats like the ones you can buy at best buy. You just put your cell phone on it and it charges up. The second phase was a wireless power source where you plug the transmitter into a wall outlet and the receiver into your device. It only worked within the same room, it has limited range. I forget what the third stage of it was but I'm sure someone can find the article. It mentioned that someone had finally figured out how to transmit small amounts of power without having lightning bolts through the air like Tesla lol.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mstng86 View PostNo, Edison had alot to do with why Tesla couldn't get anything going. He had the money and power behind him to thwart some of Tesla's research. If it was Edisons choice, we would all be running on DC still."If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
Comment
-
couldn't get any thing going? Like the Niagara falls the first hydro-electric power plant. Not trying to start a pissing contest I just think the two of them where in it for opposite reasons. Edison was going to make profits on his inventions and Tesla just wanted to better the world with his. Its hard to get big backing when theres no return on investment
Comment
Comment