Originally posted by Silverback
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Man gets 300,000 home for 16 bucks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cmarsh93zDon't Fuck with DFWmustangs...the most powerfull gang I have ever been a member of.
-
Originally posted by 347Mike View PostI must have missed that, but I don't see how using an outdated law that is on the books is manupulating the system. If it is a law and it is legal I don't see how anyone can call the guys the things they have been in this thread.
From what I can tell this law existed to keep people from laying claim to already claimed land, and not the other way around.
Without any form of title in his possession, he's looking at the 10 year process, before he can claim
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grimpala View PostPlease explain how this is wrong on any level other than what I have already stated.
I prefaced my very first post on this matter by saying that I did not believe that this was morally right, however, legally he has done nothing wrong.
Seems like you're butt hurt because you worked your ass off to get what you have and think everyone should have to as well. Do you get pissed off at lottery winners because they didn't work to earn their money?
BTW, I work and pay my taxes and don't like people getting handouts anymore than the next guy.
I don't know why you think I'm jealous of basically a criminal tresspasser/squatter. Why would I get pissed off at a lottery winner unless they stole the ticket? They bought a ticket and won. Good for them. This guy did not win the lottery. He didn't even "play". He broke into a property not owned by him and used a law (that will hopefully be changed) that allowed him to steal the property of another (up to this point). I don't think a criminal should be "cheered" that's all.
I suppose you support squatters rights when they break into someone's rental property and end up staying there for 6 months until the property owner can finally get them removed "legally" after all the bullshit they have to go through? To me it is no different.
FYI, when people are "sticking it to the man" they are really only sticking it to everyone else in the form of higher costs to all. True story.
Hopefully all the attention he is getting will get the situation resolved properly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by XR_1 View PostLOL.... You might want to do some research....
But let the pissing match begin ....
I'm 29, I build a company from scratch(I was 25) that is now worth... let's just say alot! (shit we have over $600,000 in inventory alone )
Not daddy's business, no bank loans, 1 stock holder(me)... just incase your wondering.
I'm in Dallas , let me know when you want me to show you around our warehouse that I own.
Maybe A+ can chime in as he has been here a couple of times
I am not a bad guy, I just can't understand why you'll guys like talking shit but I am always game for a little trash talking.
Last thing... Can you answer the rest of my questions
And Leah, can I get a Kaboom image too
For the rest of the people....
I am truly sorry my nut huggers had to ruin the thread, even though my actions didn't help.
But i just had to put this butt hurt trolls in their place. Sorry again.
To be a nut hugger I would have to think something of you. You're a tool, so why would I?
Comment
-
Originally posted by EW View PostI don't know why you think I'm jealous of basically a criminal tresspasser/squatter. Why would I get pissed off at a lottery winner unless they stole the ticket? They bought a ticket and won. Good for them. This guy did not win the lottery. He didn't even "play". He broke into a property not owned by him and used a law (that will hopefully be changed) that allowed him to steal the property of another (up to this point). I don't think a criminal should be "cheered" that's all.
I suppose you support squatters rights when they break into someone's rental property and end up staying there for 6 months until the property owner can finally get them removed "legally" after all the bullshit they have to go through? To me it is no different.
FYI, when people are "sticking it to the man" they are really only sticking it to everyone else in the form of higher costs to all. True story.
Hopefully all the attention he is getting will get the situation resolved properly.
Tell me this honestly, would this have been a problem for you or anyone else had the guy been white? If the house was in a shittier neighborhood/lower cost?G'Day Mate
Comment
-
Originally posted by 347Mike View PostI must have missed that, but I don't see how using an outdated law that is on the books is manupulating the system. If it is a law and it is legal I don't see how anyone can call the guys the things they have been in this thread.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EW View PostI suppose you support squatters rights when they break into someone's rental property and end up staying there for 6 months until the property owner can finally get them removed "legally" after all the bullshit they have to go through? To me it is no different.
Possession of the item itself is not 9/10 of the law. Possession of the title is possession.
Sure you can go request a title, and as long as it isn't disputed, you can end up owning the land/car. But that doesn't mean you will.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grimpala View PostTell me this honestly, would this have been a problem for you or anyone else had the guy been white? If the house was in a shittier neighborhood/lower cost?
Comment
-
Originally posted by EW View PostWhy are you trying to make this about race? I stated earlier that it did not matter who was scamming including your examples of mother with children. Scammers come in all colors. The property belongs to somebody and they should not have to fend off attacks from squatters.G'Day Mate
Comment
-
Originally posted by EW View PostWhy are you trying to make this about race? I stated earlier that it did not matter who was scamming including your examples of mother with children. Scammers come in all colors. The property belongs to somebody and they should not have to fend off attacks from squatters.
If the bank foreclosed on the house, they have legal rights to it, but until the paperwork is completed, it doesn't belong to the original owner or the bank. Once it is completed, the bank owns it. But if the bank went bankrupt, then the bankruptcy courts will have to process it, and reassign title to the new owner, if the property is purchased by another bank. Or the bankruptcy court will turn it over to someone else to sell to recoup some amount of money to clear the debt as part of the bankruptcy. Until then it's kind of in a limbo state.
Comment
-
Originally posted by exlude View PostLike I said, such a baller (and you have always claimed to be) while taking 6-7 years to build a streetable Foxbody and running fake insurance cards and tags. After all, that's what ballers do.
To be a nut hugger I would have to think something of you. You're a tool, so why would I?
Wheres my goddam Kaboom Leah?1967 Mustang Fastback - 5.0 32V Stroked Teksid - Supercar GT heads - MARCELLA Billet intake -
- Twin Precision 6766 Turbo set up - BigStuff3 - AMS1000 - Built GM 4l80e - Art Morrison Chassis
- Sparco Milano Leather Seats- Forged 18" wheels - 29" M/T tires + A/C & heat!
1991 TT Mod Foxbody Coupe- Build thread... http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=422864
Comment
Comment