Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bank asking 16 million for mansion, so Trump buys the drive way ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bank asking 16 million for mansion, so Trump buys the drive way ...

    LMAO, this is funny as shit. Donald Trump did not get rich by being a dumbass. Looks like one, but that is another story. Read the article. On a side note, nothing like a woman pissing away 100 million.





    In the history of rapid wealth loss, Patricia Kluge stands apart. Once married to one of America's richest men, she won a divorce settlement in 1990 worth more than $100 million and proceeded to spend it on her lifestyle and business ventures. She was forced to sell off her Cartier diamonds, Givenchy gowns and silk drapes before declaring personal bankruptcy in June.

    Yet the Fall of the House of Kluge has been a windfall for one man: Donald Trump.

    As Ms. Kluge's empire collapsed, Mr. Trump bought. Over the past six months, he swooped in and picked up many of the pieces of her palatial Virginia estate and winery. He bought the 1,000-acre vineyard and winery for a fraction of their original value. He bought 200 acres nearby for less than $500,000, with help from Ms. Kluge and her son.

    Now, the pompadoured billionaire and reality-TV star may have outplayed a much bigger rival in a bid for Ms. Kluge's crown jewel: her mansion. Bank of America owns the house after foreclosing and is trying to sell it for $16 million. The 24,000-square-foot neo-Georgian palace has 45 rooms, a spa, home theater, 3,500-bottle wine cellar and 2,000-square-foot sitting room.

    One thing the house doesn't have, however, is a front yard. Mr. Trump owns that, having purchased it with his 200 acres. He also owns most of the driveway and the backyard, making a sale to any other buyer difficult. Mr. Trump said he would buy it from Bank of America for $3.6 million.

    To make his point, he has erected signs on the front lawn of the mansion that read, "No Trespassing. This Land is Owned by Trump Virginia Acquisitions LLC," aimed at warding off possible buyers. He has also let the lawn go to seed.

    "Maybe someone is stupid enough to buy the house," Mr. Trump said. "I wish them luck." The broker for the house, Joseph Marchetti III, responded: "We believe the house is a salable asset as it is."

    The mansion spat is just the latest drama to emerge from the outsize life of Patricia Kluge. Ms. Kluge, who was born in Baghdad and once posed nude for a London magazine, married John Kluge in 1981. Mr. Kluge, 34 years her senior, was named the second-richest man in America in 1986 by Forbes magazine after making billions from his Metromedia broadcasting empire. Ms. Kluge became a prominent socialite in New York, Palm Beach and Virginia.

    In 1990, the Kluges divorced. Media reported that Ms. Kluge received $1 billion, but the settlement—which included an income stream and property—was actually worth between $100 million and $200 million, according to people familiar with her finances. Mr. Kluge died last September at the age of 95.

  • #2
    I always thought if your property surrounded someone else's, you had to allow them right of way to it. What's that called, legally?

    EDIT: It's a right of way easement. He's really fucked if he thinks he can keep someone that buys the house out of it and off his land, since the parcels were seperated from the same original property, which originally had road access. A little records digging, and the owner of the house wouldn't have to pay a dime.

    EDIT2: http://www.martinwrenlaw.com/virgini...les/access.pdf
    Last edited by YALE; 07-03-2011, 08:01 AM.
    ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

    Comment


    • #3
      What a gold-digging high maintenance stupid materialistic greedy bitch. Any well-adjusted person that were to recieve $100M would likely have a few nice things including a nice house, but anyone with any financial sense whatsoever would not blow through $100M like that. Especially when a good portion of that amount was property and an "income stream" that was likely well into the millions per year.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Yale View Post
        I always thought if your property surrounded someone else's, you had to allow them right of way to it. What's that called, legally?

        EDIT: It's a right of way easement. He's really fucked if he thinks he can keep someone that buys the house out of it and off his land, since the parcels were seperated from the same original property, which originally had road access. A little records digging, and the owner of the house wouldn't have to pay a dime.

        EDIT2: http://www.martinwrenlaw.com/virgini...les/access.pdf
        Trump may not legally be able to prevent acces to the property, but the hassle, lawyer fees involved, and the fact that there is an overgrown and unmaintained "driveway" seriously diminishes the value of the property for sale.

        He'll either make money on the sale of the access property to the new owners of the house, or make money by buyng and re-selling the entire undervalued property when the bank is unable to get their asking price.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Big A View Post
          What a gold-digging high maintenance stupid materialistic greedy bitch. Any well-adjusted person that were to recieve $100M would likely have a few nice things including a nice house, but anyone with any financial sense whatsoever would not blow through $100M like that. Especially when a good portion of that amount was property and an "income stream" that was likely well into the millions per year.
          Last edited by YALE; 07-03-2011, 10:01 AM.
          ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Big A View Post
            Trump may not legally be able to prevent acces to the property, but the hassle, lawyer fees involved, and the fact that there is an overgrown and unmaintained "driveway" seriously diminishes the value of the property for sale.

            He'll either make money on the sale of the access property to the new owners of the house, or make money by buyng and re-selling the entire undervalued property when the bank is unable to get their asking price.
            Oh, no doubt it's the right move. It's just not insurmountable.
            ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Yale View Post
              Oh, no doubt it's the right move. It's just not insurmountable.
              Oh, absolutely. Anyone with that kind of money could put in a Heli-pad for that matter, it's all about that reduced value and/or extra expense though.

              Comment


              • #8
                He could open a landfill or put up warehouses and render the house worthless. Even if he he is forced to grant easement to and from the property, he owns all the surrounding land and can do anything he wants with it.

                3.6mil house = worthless.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Proves what dumbasses the people running Bank of America are. They are already having trouble selling the estate, and anyone with half a brain knows that splitting up a property like that is going to make it even more difficult to sell, yet BOA still broke it up, making a tough sale even harder.

                  No doubt Trump knows he has to allow a buyer access to their house. He likely did it to create a tougher sale and force the bank to practically give him the house so he can turn around and make a nice profit. Plus it makes BOA look like idiots which is funny as hell.
                  I don't like Republicans, but I really FUCKING hate Democrats.


                  Sex with an Asian woman is great, but 30 minutes later you're horny again.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by LANTIRN View Post
                    Proves what dumbasses the people running Bank of America are. They are already having trouble selling the estate, and anyone with half a brain knows that splitting up a property like that is going to make it even more difficult to sell, yet BOA still broke it up, making a tough sale even harder.

                    No doubt Trump knows he has to allow a buyer access to their house. He likely did it to create a tougher sale and force the bank to practically give him the house so he can turn around and make a nice profit. Plus it makes BOA look like idiots which is funny as hell.
                    BOA most likelt didn't have rights to the land that was sold. That property itself could have been owned outright by the estate, and she financed just the building of the house through BOA.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by likeitfast55 View Post
                      He could open a landfill or put up warehouses and render the house worthless. Even if he he is forced to grant easement to and from the property, he owns all the surrounding land and can do anything he wants with it.

                      3.6mil house = worthless.
                      zoning. just because he owns it doesn't mean he can do what he wants with it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Sergio View Post
                        zoning. just because he owns it doesn't mean he can do what he wants with it.
                        When you have that kind of coin, you can buy zoning boards. And I thought the property was rural, putting outside of most zoning regulations.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          donald trump has the idea and the smart people that work for him enforce his business practices!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            If the property is landlocked, they're fucked. A right of way easment is a document signed by the owner of the dominant property that will allow access to the landlocked property. They do not have to grant access. The right of way is only valid with permission.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Just another reason why he's a very smart business man.
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X