Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ford with bow tie engine...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
    Maybe you've heard of the 84 svo?
    That was a 4 banger

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Lason View Post
      That was a 4 banger
      It was a turbo car made for performance.

      Oh and I didnt know the GN was direct injected and got 25+ mpg

      320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

      DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
        Maybe you've heard of the 84 svo?
        How about the '78 Buick Regal with a turbo ?

        Comment


        • #94
          But I'll say this.

          Porsche was the first to introduce direct injection gasoline engines into production. Porsche has had a lot to do with turbo technology too. If I'm not mistaken.

          320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

          DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
            But I'll say this.

            Porsche was the first to introduce direct injection gasoline engines into production. Porsche has had a lot to do with turbo technology too. If I'm not mistaken.
            Stay off wiki, doesnt someone need spark plugs?

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by CRASH View Post
              How about the '78 Buick Regal with a turbo ?
              He said grand national.

              In 78 ford was gay.

              320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

              DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

              Comment


              • #97
                Where was the camaro at in the early 90s?

                Look at the late 80s early 90s corvettes.

                Hell a good running foxbody will give them a run for the money.

                My clapped out coupe out ran a 87.

                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                  It was a turbo car made for performance.

                  Oh and I didnt know the GN was direct injected and got 25+ mpg
                  Seriously? Every heard of the 80-81 Turbo trans ams? Shitacular 301 V8 turbos. Wanna go back even further? How about the late 70's regals with turbos?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Lason View Post
                    Seriously? Every heard of the 80-81 Turbo trans ams? Shitacular 301 V8 turbos. Wanna go back even further? How about the late 70's regals with turbos?
                    You said it not me.

                    They were shitty.

                    Is the Eco boost shitty? No.

                    Was the 2.3 turbo shitty? Hell no.

                    The grand national has always been a favorite car for me. So I won't knock the 3.8 turbo, GM did great on that car.

                    320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                    DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                    Comment


                    • I don't mind a SBC in an older ford.
                      Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

                      Comment


                      • Jeez, Mike. If everybody was trying to forget how much of a moron you are, every post you've made in this thread ruins it.
                        Originally posted by Broncojohnny
                        HOORAY ME and FUCK YOU!

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by That_Is_My_El_Camino View Post
                          Jeez, Mike. If everybody was trying to forget how much of a moron you are, every post you've made in this thread ruins it.
                          But they aren't so my post prompt for an immediate call out.

                          Got to get my rep up some how!

                          320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                          DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Grimpala View Post
                            Although you make a good point, the pictures you used to do it aren't exactly apples to apples.
                            I agree. However, I'm not going to spend more than 30 seconds trying to find something closer. Those are.... green apples to red ones perhaps? Add some bling to one, take away from the other. The point is the distributor, etc.
                            Originally posted by Taya Kyle, American Gun
                            There comes a time when honest debate, serious diplomatic efforts, and logical arguments have been exhausted and only men and women willing to take up arms against evil will suffice to save the freedom of a nation or continent.

                            Comment


                            • And just for the fun of it....yes the 86-87 GN/T-Types did get 25+mpg.....if you didn't have the gas pedal mashed to the floor with 15psi boost.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ram57ta View Post
                                And just for the fun of it....yes the 86-87 GN/T-Types did get 25+mpg.....if you didn't have the gas pedal mashed to the floor with 15psi boost.
                                That's no fun.

                                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X