Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

People never cease to amaze me....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I think we are going to need a picture... lol

    Comment


    • #17
      Lol. Almost funny it is!
      www.allforoneroofing.com

      Comment


      • #18
        Shit, I wouldn't have known what to do either with the flares there. I would have just turned around myself. On a side note, can you just lift the arms a bit and they automatically go back up? I heard this somewhere but have no idea if there's truth to it.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Jedi View Post
          If i saw flares, id turn around and find another way.

          Flares mean do not enter.
          Go around in this case means turn around. It is impossible to go around this set of tracks.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Shaggin Wagon View Post
            Shit, I wouldn't have known what to do either with the flares there. I would have just turned around myself. On a side note, can you just lift the arms a bit and they automatically go back up? I heard this somewhere but have no idea if there's truth to it.
            I'm not touching the arms for liability sake. If I lifted them, and later a train comes and I unkowingly did something to the arms and they no longer worked properly, then I'd be in a shot-ton of trouble if someone got injured.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by That_Is_My_El_Camino View Post
              Typical cop doubletalk!
              Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
              Go around in this case means turn around. It is impossible to go around this set of tracks.
              Lmao!
              Originally posted by davbrucas
              I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

              Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

              You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                Go around in this case means turn around. It is impossible to go around this set of tracks.
                uh oh, grammer nazi's will be looking for you!!!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                  I'm not touching the arms for liability sake. If I lifted them, and later a train comes and I unkowingly did something to the arms and they no longer worked properly, then I'd be in a shot-ton of trouble if someone got injured.
                  Ah yes, that would not be good!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                    I'm not touching the arms for liability sake. If I lifted them, and later a train comes and I unkowingly did something to the arms and they no longer worked properly, then I'd be in a shot-ton of trouble if someone got injured.
                    Having a 12 year background as a signal maintainer for 2 railroads I can vouch that you made the right decision...I've seen police reprimanded for wedging up gate arms at malfunctioning crossings. Some crossing mechanisms operate on gravity and have no locking feature to hold the gates down so the gates can simply be lifted, but some railroads use gate mechs that power down the gate arms and then LOCK them into position so that the only way they can be raised is either to power them up by tricking the circuits, repairing whatever is holding them down (could be a number of issues related to lightning damage or even excessive runoff shunting the tracks), or to knock the gate down. Most railroads get seriously upset about ANYONE other than a qualified signals technician tampering with crossing equipment EVEN if they had good intentions.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by ram57ta View Post
                      Having a 12 year background as a signal maintainer for 2 railroads I can vouch that you made the right decision...I've seen police reprimanded for wedging up gate arms at malfunctioning crossings. Some crossing mechanisms operate on gravity and have no locking feature to hold the gates down so the gates can simply be lifted, but some railroads use gate mechs that power down the gate arms and then LOCK them into position so that the only way they can be raised is either to power them up by tricking the circuits, repairing whatever is holding them down (could be a number of issues related to lightning damage or even excessive runoff shunting the tracks), or to knock the gate down. Most railroads get seriously upset about ANYONE other than a qualified signals technician tampering with crossing equipment EVEN if they had good intentions.
                      Yeah I hear they will protest for higher wages.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Shaggin Wagon View Post
                        uh oh, grammer nazi's will be looking for you!!!
                        I'm guilty of typing lazy on the iPhone.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by ram57ta View Post
                          Having a 12 year background as a signal maintainer for 2 railroads I can vouch that you made the right decision...I've seen police reprimanded for wedging up gate arms at malfunctioning crossings. Some crossing mechanisms operate on gravity and have no locking feature to hold the gates down so the gates can simply be lifted, but some railroads use gate mechs that power down the gate arms and then LOCK them into position so that the only way they can be raised is either to power them up by tricking the circuits, repairing whatever is holding them down (could be a number of issues related to lightning damage or even excessive runoff shunting the tracks), or to knock the gate down. Most railroads get seriously upset about ANYONE other than a qualified signals technician tampering with crossing equipment EVEN if they had good intentions.
                          I don't work for the railroad, and those gates are RR property, not city property, not to mention I'm not a qualified technician, so I don't touch them.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
                            I don't work for the railroad, and those gates are RR property, not city property, not to mention I'm not a qualified technician, so I don't touch them.
                            To add to that..several years ago when I worked at DART we had a bad storm one night with high winds that knocked out power to a lot of south Dallas and also broke the shear bolts on a few gates which caused some of them to fall down sideways onto the overhead catenary system (partially blocking the road AND the tracks). The overhead Catenary at DART carries 850 volts DC. A supervisor who apparently didn't understand how electricity works was ALMOST electrocuted when he attempted to raise the arm off the wires because someone who was sitting at the crossing started bitching about DART interfering with his night. Thankfully the substation tripped offline when it sensed a ground.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I understood what he ment. He put flares down to turn "AWAY" motorists from the crossing.
                              Or go "AROUND"(find another way).


                              Serious dumb asses here.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                So glad I decided to to push the weekly shoping trip to Target ......
                                89 mustang coupe at the house now ..... SOLD
                                97 F-250 HD crew cab shorty 4x4 overfueled for your pleasure ................

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X