I had no idea a CHL could manage a bar.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CHL Managing a Bar
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
-
Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View PostPoor grammar runs this place, so why not?Originally posted by davbrucasI want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.
Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?
You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stephen View Postthis is exactly what im wanting to know.. we are not a 51% bar but very close to it
I'm not a lawyer, so check other sources as well.Matts1911SA - XBox Live Gamertag
Comment
-
Originally posted by slow06 View PostI believe if you are in a bar that isn't posted you are ok. I believe the requirement was recently changed to say it has to be posted, even if the CHL'er would assume they meet the 51% requirement.Originally posted by NTexas_V-Star View PostI believe you're correct. If memory serves, during the 2009 legislative session, the requirement was made stricter in that the establishment has to be properly posted.
Code:GC 411.204. NOTICE REQUIRED ON CERTAIN PREMISES. (a) A business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, and that derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code, shall prominently display at each entrance to the business premises a sign that complies with the requirements of Subsection (c). ... (c) The sign required under Subsections (a) and (b) must give notice in both English and Spanish that it is unlawful for a person licensed under this subchapter to carry a handgun on the premises. The sign must appear in contrasting colors with block letters at least one inch in height and must include on its face the number "51" printed in solid red at least five inches in height. The sign shall be displayed in a conspicuous manner clearly visible to the public. PC 46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun. (b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed, on or about the license holder's person: (1) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code; ... (k) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (b)(1) that the actor was not given effective notice under Section 411.204, Government Code.
Originally posted by propellerhead View PostIf you were working there and have been appointed by the owner to be the security person, you'd be carrying under that authorization. Not as a CHL holder. If that is actually how the law is, then the whole 51% thing would not apply to you.
IANAL, though.Last edited by GhostTX; 03-07-2011, 10:27 AM."Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikec View PostI do it all the time with no issues.
That ought be interesting. Yelling "Get off my lawn!" when the police come and such.Originally posted by MR EDDU defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.
Comment
-
Ok I've been patient lol..
A. Lets say the biz owner is cool with it
B. the restaurant is not 51%
C. I dont have a chl
Am I allowed to carry inside the restaurant since there is a lot of cash and other transactions handled there? There are patrons who drink and could possibly make a bad decision (remember cafe gecko 2 years ago).. Plus i open the restaurant and take the $$ to the bank just about every day..
I would love for some police to chime in
Imo, as a sober (while working) manager without bad intentions i should be allowed to carry. I supervise several females handling lots of cash who could easily get robbed. Ive looked on the tabc websites and it all just looks like lines of code lol"PSH!!!"
Comment
-
CHL is a null point for this. With the owners permission as an employee you would be able to carry regardless of CHL. You are more of armed security at this point. You may want to see if there are any laws that pertain to that.
If it a franchised bar or chain I can almost garrantee they have a no weapons in the workplace policy.07 f250-family truckster
08 Denali -baby hauler
52 f1-rust bucket
05 Jeep tj. Buggy
livin the double-wide dream
Comment
-
Originally posted by whitetrash View PostCHL is a null point for this. With the owners permission as an employee you would be able to carry regardless of CHL. You are more of armed security at this point. You may want to see if there are any laws that pertain to that.
Another thing to remember is that a restaurant or bar will have a denser population and any type of shoot out has a greater chance of hitting a third party, even a hit on the offender could endanger another.
Comment
Comment