Originally posted by LANTIRN
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Legal SBR that requires no stamp???
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
Anyway... so the stickler is the "straight rifling".
So instead of paying for an overpriced 4 MOA weapon (unless you want to buy crazy "finned" ammo), what's to keep other companies from making a straight rifled barrel for a standard AR-15 receiver?
Better yet, let's all use common sense and push for these stupid SBR rules to be kicked to the curb completely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gargamel View PostSo instead of paying for an overpriced 4 MOA weapon (unless you want to buy crazy "finned" ammo), what's to keep other companies from making a straight rifled barrel for a standard AR-15 receiver?
1 MOA 300BLK but you have to use fin-stabilized rounds (cost???)off the shelf short barrel 300BLK upper on a pistol lower with a braceor
Either they're trying to push the rules to highlight the retardedness of the NFA, or these guys have been eating too many Tide pods.
Comment
-
^^^ LMAO! Perfect.
I was telling a friend that this would be like if during a marketing meeting at Coca Cola, one of the guys chimed in with, "Hey, even though we've done every variety of Diet Coke that can be done, why don't we make a tomato-flavored one that literally nobody has asked for, and charge 8 times the price of the others for it!""It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."
Comment
-
Originally posted by 32vfromhell View PostSwing and a miss.
They really dropped the ball on their pricing. If this came in very cheap, then it -would- sell.
Now, getting a tax stamp on a SBR comes in at far cheaper than this.I don't like Republicans, but I really FUCKING hate Democrats.
Sex with an Asian woman is great, but 30 minutes later you're horny again.
Comment
Comment