I am looking to buy a new gun/rifle and am looking at 2 that i cant seem to choose between. I have a pretty good assortment right now and all current ones have fairly specific purposes.
I want this purchase to fulfill the what if I had to grab a few things and bug out scenario. My 300 blackout would have limited usefulness as ammo would run out and be hard to find. My pistols have limited range and low capacity.
So what I am looking at is either a FN PS90 with 50 rd mags or a Kel-tec sub 2000 in 40 cal and glock mags.
The PS90 has similar ammo issues to my 300 blackout but it holds more per mag and ammo is lighter so I could feasibly carry a lot more. It has good range and can exhibit good penetration.
The Kel-tec seems like the more sensible choice as it is half the price and so is ammo. You can find 40 s & w just about anywhere and it isn't 60 cents a shot. Range is limited but with the 16" barrel it is much better than a 3.5" pistol.
Both are super short and will fit in a duffle bag.
If you were to choose one as a BOB gun, which would it be and why? Would you choose something else instead?
I want this purchase to fulfill the what if I had to grab a few things and bug out scenario. My 300 blackout would have limited usefulness as ammo would run out and be hard to find. My pistols have limited range and low capacity.
So what I am looking at is either a FN PS90 with 50 rd mags or a Kel-tec sub 2000 in 40 cal and glock mags.
The PS90 has similar ammo issues to my 300 blackout but it holds more per mag and ammo is lighter so I could feasibly carry a lot more. It has good range and can exhibit good penetration.
The Kel-tec seems like the more sensible choice as it is half the price and so is ammo. You can find 40 s & w just about anywhere and it isn't 60 cents a shot. Range is limited but with the 16" barrel it is much better than a 3.5" pistol.
Both are super short and will fit in a duffle bag.
If you were to choose one as a BOB gun, which would it be and why? Would you choose something else instead?
Comment