Who's gonna open carry?

[SS Junk]

I tried to make one that was to the tune of stevebjjarmbarkimura#1fightfightfight to no avail. I must not be a part of the "in" crowd.

[FunFordCobra]

put the shirt on foreal and lets see how it swallows your torso.
I was wondering why CJ wasn't posting. I figured he had inside info lol.

[GhostTX]

I'll agree that rights need to be protected from political whim, but characterizing them as being a mandate from an absentee deity is just silly.

You have your beliefs, I'll have mine. But to not have an absolute authority from which all rights are derived, then no rights are absolute.

[YALE]

You have your beliefs, I'll have mine. But to not have an absolute authority from which all rights are derived, then no rights are absolute.

Then I guess I'm a utilitarian.

[Semper299]

Well played sir.....Well played

[GhostTX]

Then I guess I'm a utilitarian.

Nice, but it's still a contract per se subject to change.

"In all determinations of morality, this circumstance of public utility is ever principally in view; and wherever disputes arise, either in philosophy or common life, concerning the bounds of duty, the question cannot, by any means, be decided with greater certainty, than by ascertaining, on any side, the true interests of mankind. If any false opinion, embraced from appearances, has been found to prevail; as soon as farther experience and sounder reasoning have given us juster notions of human affairs, we retract our first sentiment, and adjust anew the boundaries of moral good and evil."

You and I could probably go round-n-round for awhile, but I believe we're on the same team as far as OP is concerned.

[YALE]

Nice, but it's still a contract per se subject to change.

"In all determinations of morality, this circumstance of public utility is ever principally in view; and wherever disputes arise, either in philosophy or common life, concerning the bounds of duty, the question cannot, by any means, be decided with greater certainty, than by ascertaining, on any side, the true interests of mankind. If any false opinion, embraced from appearances, has been found to prevail; as soon as farther experience and sounder reasoning have given us juster notions of human affairs, we retract our first sentiment, and adjust anew the boundaries of moral good and evil."

You and I could probably go round-n-round for awhile, but I believe we're on the same team as far as OP is concerned.

For sure.

[John -- '02 HAWK]

Whats the status of this? I've been out of the loop for the last couple of weeks

[Moose242]

Still gay.

[Gasser64]

May I carry on school campus (legally)?

Yes, just not inside the building. They made them redefine the word "premises" and its now within the walls of the building itself. The way it was, people were technically breaking the law by driving by a school while carrying. So can you take it in the parking lot and have it in your vehicle? Yes. Can you take it inside? No.

[John -- '02 HAWK]

Yes, just not inside the building. They made them redefine the word "premises" and its now within the walls of the building itself. The way it was, people were technically breaking the law by driving by a school while carrying. So can you take it in the parking lot and have it in your vehicle? Yes. Can you take it inside? No.

could you link that? I hadn't heard any of that had passed

[Probie]

could you link that? I hadn't heard any of that had passed

You've been able to carry on the premises just not inside the building for a while.

[bobs94formula]

You've been able to carry on the premises just not inside the building for a while.

What he said.

[Gasser64]

could you link that? I hadn't heard any of that had passed

Its in your CHL handbook, that's where I read it. If the CHL handbook can be found online you can view it there

[John -- '02 HAWK]

I just looked again and didnt see anything that said it was ok to carry on school property. Its ok to drive park and store a firearm in a personal vehicle on school property. So what am I missing