Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wilson Beretta 92

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by bybotie View Post
    Finally received my gun. Months late but worth the wait.
    Let me shoot it!!
    2012 GT500

    Comment


    • #47
      I'm surprised at the positive responses on the 92. I always thought gun guys considered them junk. I love the feel of it and I've always wanted one.

      I did own a cheetah (smaller, .380 version) that was a real hunk of shit so I haven't considered another beretta since, but I may now.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Baba Ganoush View Post
        I'm surprised at the positive responses on the 92. I always thought gun guys considered them junk. I love the feel of it and I've always wanted one.

        I did own a cheetah (smaller, .380 version) that was a real hunk of shit so I haven't considered another beretta since, but I may now.
        It's not gun guys that don't like them it's us ex-military folks. And I will be 100% honest it isn't even a bad pistol, but it destroys magazines. They run great on new or fresh magazines. Once the magazine has been used a lot and reloaded often they start to stove pipe and FTF like a mofo. So how often do you think the mags get used and reused in the military? Well the training guns are over used.... so you go to the range to qualify. You get 3 mags for your M9. I guarantee two of them are going to be shit from over use and you are going to be dropping bullets on the ground and your score will suck as a result.

        The Beretta is a lot like a larger version of the CZ75 just with shittier magazines. The CZ is smaller, lighter and more reliable and has pretty much the same feel to it.... so get a CZ and be happier.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by bybotie View Post
          Finally received my gun. Months late but worth the wait.
          Very nice!

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by AnthonyS View Post
            It's not gun guys that don't like them it's us ex-military folks. And I will be 100% honest it isn't even a bad pistol, but it destroys magazines. They run great on new or fresh magazines. Once the magazine has been used a lot and reloaded often they start to stove pipe and FTF like a mofo. So how often do you think the mags get used and reused in the military? Well the training guns are over used.... so you go to the range to qualify. You get 3 mags for your M9. I guarantee two of them are going to be shit from over use and you are going to be dropping bullets on the ground and your score will suck as a result.

            The Beretta is a lot like a larger version of the CZ75 just with shittier magazines. The CZ is smaller, lighter and more reliable and has pretty much the same feel to it.... so get a CZ and be happier.
            And a plain Jane CZ75 is cheaper.
            Last edited by YALE; 07-20-2015, 09:14 PM.
            ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

            Comment


            • #51
              Even though the cz75 and 92 are completely different with completely different actions.
              "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
              "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by CJ View Post
                Even though the cz75 and 92 are completely different with completely different actions.
                Sure but both are all metal frame slim upper slide 9mms. Both also hold 14 to 17 rounds. Both also have a decocker or safety. While they are totally different designs both shoot fairly similar too due to their size, weight and caliber. I own a CZ but would never own a 92 after carrying them in the Navy. If you like the 92, you will love the CZ. The CZ also has better magazines, which is the achilles heel of the 92.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Safeties on DA/SA guns suck. Decockers or bust.
                  ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by YALE View Post
                    Safeties on DA/SA guns suck. Decockers or bust.
                    That's why we have Sig's and a CZ75P01 with a decocker. Thank goodness you can get both on a CZ. I still prefer SAO though.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by AnthonyS View Post
                      That's why we have Sig's and a CZ75P01 with a decocker. Thank goodness you can get both on a CZ. I still prefer SAO though.
                      Those exist, too. You should check out Cajun Gun Works. I've been drooling over their CZ-97.
                      ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Decocker... huh, huh.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X