Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Windham ARs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Mysticcobrakilla View Post
    CJ, just let it be. I'll explain some other time... I promise.

    I'm not worried about value down the road or anything else. Just wanted to know if they made a quality product.

    I trust y'all's opinion. That's why I asked.

    I'm a glock owner...so what do I know
    It will work fine.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Mysticcobrakilla View Post
      CJ, just let it be. I'll explain some other time... I promise.

      I'm not worried about value down the road or anything else. Just wanted to know if they made a quality product.

      I trust y'all's opinion. That's why I asked.

      I'm a glock owner...so what do I know


      Fucking glock owner

      For what you will be doing its a good choice and at that price shit once you get hooked start looking at something higher end if you choose to. (Although I would just start building after you got the hang of it) .

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by CJ View Post
        I'm not sure what you mean, you understand that a lot of shit is unnecessary but you don't care? To summarize what I'm saying is just about all ar15's are the same for 99% of peoples uses. I wouldn't get caught up in who makes anything. There's only a handful of real separate components out there.
        Perfectly said.

        Buddy bought a Noveske for his SBR build. Paid a shit ton for it. He got his trust waited his 9 months , stamp------ went to build his weapon, oooops the front take down pin holes were at a different angle making the lower worthless.
        Just an example of even higher end overpaid components can have defects.

        Just a few on this board are above amateur status with regard to guns/components. To be clear, I am not one of them. The more I learn, the more I find out that I do not know shit about guns compared to some.
        Last edited by likeitfast55; 08-13-2014, 11:51 AM.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by likeitfast55 View Post
          Perfectly said.

          Buddy bought a Noveske for his SBR build. Paid a shit ton for it. He got his trust waited his 9 months , stamp------ went to build his weapon, oooops the front take down pin holes were at a different angle making the lower worthless.
          Just an example of even higher end overpaid components can have defects.
          I had a similar issue with the LMT upper I bought for my SBR build. Nothing a bit of filing couldn't handle.

          Comment


          • #20
            He sent it back to Noveske. They sent him another, same sr#. Just a few months more to wait!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by likeitfast55 View Post
              He sent it back to Noveske. They sent him another, same sr#. Just a few months more to wait!
              Damn. I am gonna have to check the Noveske lower Silencerco gave me later. I hope that lower is good, I can't wait to SBR it.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Pokulski-Blatz View Post
                Damn. I am gonna have to check the Noveske lower Silencerco gave me later. I hope that lower is good, I can't wait to SBR it.
                I would build it out, shoot it to make sure everything is good to go before investing a shit ton of time and money.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by likeitfast55 View Post
                  I would build it out, shoot it to make sure everything is good to go before investing a shit ton of time and money.
                  I am just transferring my current SBR upper over to the Noveske. The old SBR lower has a el cheapo $260 10.5" upper waiting on it. I am setting a goal to put together a 10.5" free float railed SBR that is reliable for under $900 including the tax stamp.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I saw one of these the other day. Very nice fit and finish. Have any info on this combo?

                    Yankee Hill. All Billet lower and matching Billet upper.



                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Ah, YHM's patented tactical slimming lines. Those slimming lines tested very well with operators.

                      In all seriousness it look like nothing more than another billet lower. While they fit a bit better than the forged ones, I don't much like them because they are so chunky. I have a Quentin Defense QD 15 Army marked upper and lower I bought years ago that fits really nicely like you would expect any billet receiver. One of these days I will build it into a MK11 clone.



                      Given the choice though I will take a forged lower over a billet one any day of the week just as a result of size.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X