Tweet
Anyone have any tips, insight, thoughts, opinions. etc etc on determining ring height?
-
-
Dont you want to get it as close as you can to the bore? -
Man fuck if I know. Im just starting to pay attention to this shit and have read to much to know if that was mentioned. lolOriginally posted by Sleeper View PostComment
-
That is the goal, and without letting it touch the barrel.Originally posted by Sleeper View PostZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! hehComment
-
-
-
Ring height will vary depending on type of base used plus objective diameter and main tube diameter."It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"Comment
-
Yeah, I found a calculator that lets you input base, rings, scope, cover etc.Originally posted by dee View Post
I wasnt thinking from as close to barrel perspective, but from a shooter/head placement/looking through the scope perspective.Comment
-
Stock design can play a larger role than most think. If the stock doesn't have a large enough cheek rest then are large objective scope isn't going to do the shooter any good."It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"Comment
-
Hopefully mcmillan a5 is big enough. LolComment
-
Should be fine but if a large objective like the NF 56mm a adjustable cheek piece or stock pack may be needed."It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"Comment
-
I've left te atacr for an f1. The atacr is to gigantic.Comment
-
get the scope as close to the bore line as possible and use your stock to adjust your relief and cheek weld."When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser TytlerComment
-
Something like this is optimal...
Comment
-
Originally posted by inline 6 View PostSomething like this is optimal...
That's what I'm shooting for, but with more larue shit.Comment
Comment