Sweet!

[FunFordCobra]

I'm just saying...if you buy a kimber..go ahead and buy an old one. I have a 2013 and from my experience and what I have read their quality control is horrible and so is their customer service as of now. I wished I would have bought the colt instead...The colt was cheaper lol..

The rep actually said to me that its highly unlikely they will find a 1-2% flaw and in normal testing. They run only a few shots through. You're lucky if they run a full mag through your gun. They need to run 80-100 through mine.

So all I can do is send all this paperwork in with it and hope they ether fix or replace it.

[Moose242]

Nambu Type 94 = Safer than a Kimber.

[danielhv]

Nambu Type 94 = Safer than a Kimber.

Nambu Type 94 = one ugly fucking gun.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4

[Moose242]

Nambu Type 94 = one ugly fucking gun.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4

It is the most dangerous gun on earth (to the person wielding it of course).

[Probie]

Wrong one

[Nash B.]

You should make a third one that's too small to read.

[Moose242]

Original:

[YALE]

FFC: You seem like a nice dude, but your taste in guns is somehow more questionable than your taste in women.

[Nash B.]

And he apparently handles them both equally well.

[Probie]

FFC: You seem like a nice dude, but your taste in guns is somehow more questionable than your taste in women.

Lol

[Sgt Beavis]

FFC: You seem like a nice dude, but your taste in guns is somehow more questionable than your taste in women.

So his women are cheaper and less likely to blow his head off?

[YALE]

So his women are cheaper and less likely to blow his head off?

Ha!

[FunFordCobra]

So his women are cheaper and less likely to blow his head off?

I'd say it's the exact opposite of that lol

[KBScobravert]

Most high end 1911s require 1,000 round break ins. Check out Ed Brown, and Wilson Combat. I have gone to the range and burned through ammo to break in both a Brown and 2 Wilsons. It is not that they need that many rounds to get them feed properly.

I don't care what Arlington PD called it. ND vs AD is a long winded argument but basis is, there are next to zero firearm accidents only negligent handling.

An accident is when the slide goes home on a round that has been used as the chambered round far too many times. Loose, light primer strikes will occur making that particular ROUND prone to an AD but you just dropping the magazine changes nothing internal in the firearm that would drop the hammer.

Negligent Discharge would be A 1911 has to be in FIRE to fire. Negligent being the weapon was not on Safe and you caused the firearm to fire. With the safety on you can throw it down the stairs and it is not going to fire. Keep weapon on Safe until you intend to fire.

Then again, there is a reason clearing barrels and pads are built the way they are. People can be Negligent at times. I will try and get some pictures of the clearing barrels here on base. ALL OF THEM HAVE BULLET HOLES IN THEM. Weapon on safe. Drop Magazine. Weapon off safe (for a 1911). Pull slide to rear, repeat. Pull trigger. Place weapon on safe. Replace any rounds that came out into the magazine, replace magazine. People still fail to drop the magazine but instead chamber a round before pulling the trigger, happens all the time. Funnier when they fire 2-3 rounds because they are not smart enough to stop their negligent behavior.

[Jose]

I took it as, he dropped the mag out of the gun, and was going to rack the slide to clear the gun to take down and clean, but upon ejecting the mag, it fired...

I want to know where your trigger finger was during the ejecting of the mag?

OK that would make sense, I just couldn't understand WTF he was saying.