Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cyber security bill has magazine ban amendment (S.A. 2575)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    SA 2575. Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. REED, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, to enhance the security and resiliency of the cyber and communications infrastructure of the United States; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:


    At the appropriate place, insert the following

    SEC. __. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.

    (a) Definition.––Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:

    ``(30) The term `large capacity ammunition feeding device'––

    ``(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

    ``(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.''.

    (b) Prohibitions.––Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:

    ``(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

    [Page: S5403]

    ``(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.


    ``(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to––

    ``(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

    ``(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

    ``(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or

    ``(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.''.

    (c) Penalties.––Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

    ``(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.''.

    (d) Identification Markings.––Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ``A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.''.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Dacotua View Post
      SA 2575. Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. REED, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 3414, to enhance the security and resiliency of the cyber and communications infrastructure of the United States; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:


      At the appropriate place, insert the following

      SEC. __. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.

      (a) Definition.––Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:

      ``(30) The term `large capacity ammunition feeding device'––

      ``(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

      ``(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.''.

      (b) Prohibitions.––Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:

      ``(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

      [Page: S5403]

      ``(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.


      ``(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

      ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to––

      ``(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

      ``(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

      ``(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or

      ``(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.''.

      (c) Penalties.––Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

      ``(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.''.

      (d) Identification Markings.––Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ``A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.''.
      Might has well just say: We, the chosen ones speaking from Satan's throne in the Middle East will disarm and destroy. Look out Christians, until you wake up and see what the Anti-Christ Chicago regime has in mind for you we are dead.

      Comment


      • #33
        I just puked a little.

        Guess I need to put off buying diapers bags and worry about more magazines.
        I already have somewhere around 90-100 AR mags (80 of which are Pmags)
        22 XD9 mags
        and many more but obviously not enough if they are going to put the kibosh on us.
        Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by otrtruckpro View Post
          For those of you into the 2nd Amendment and believe in the right to bear arms, I hope that all of you are members of the NRA, They are the strongest opposition we against the anti-gun, far left, socialists, like Reid, Ossama, Peilosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Marx, Stalin and alike who yearn for the day when they can disarm law abiding Americans. Do these Anti-Gun democrats really think banning assault weapons and ammo clips will stop any thing. Look at Mexico, They have some of the most tightest gun control laws in the world, Yet it is has the highest murder rate in the world. More people were murdered in Mexico then the rest of the civilized word combined. Join the NRA today and protect your rights. And, no, I am not a spokesperson for the NRA, Just a concerned American watching the Constitution get taken apart piece by piece by The new regime.
          Don't forget about www.TSRA.com
          There are other groups that can be more proactive. Faster with email and mail alerts.

          America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownership

          All deserve your time, money, and attention.

          Comment


          • #35
            Well that didn't go how the gun grabbers wanted it to. Ha Ha.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by CJ View Post
              There's no way this is going to pass in an election year.
              ^^^
              "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
              "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by bigmuskie View Post
                Well that didn't go how the gun grabbers wanted it to. Ha Ha.

                http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/0...ils-in-senate/
                I don't think anyone "wanted" it to go through but nobody wants to be stuck out if it did pass. I clearly remember the last one and not being able to get magazines over 10 rounds in capacity. As a kid I was pretty pissed to have to reload my 10-22 so frequently.
                Last edited by inline 6; 08-03-2012, 09:56 AM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  This won't stop shooting sprees.



                  "I was gonna shoot up the mall but these dang 10 round mags suck. Oh well."

                  _______________________________________
                  Now stop whining.
                  Non tapatalk Sig so the butt hurt va-JJs can stop crying about not being able to turn it off.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    If anything they will spawn in more occurrence now that they have to carry less rounds

                    Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
                    First hand witness at the failure of public healthcare.

                    Comment


                    • #41
                      Originally posted by GrayStangGT View Post
                      Obama is going to EO it? Wow...good luck with that.
                      "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

                      Comment


                      • #42
                        Originally posted by GrayStangGT View Post
                        Originally posted by GhostTX View Post
                        Obama is going to EO it? Wow...good luck with that.
                        But he doesn't have the authority to enact laws (hi-cap mag ban) without Congress's approval.

                        Who gives a shit about "cyber security"? If companies and government offices are setting up and maintaining their systems, "cyber threats" are not an issue.
                        كافر

                        Originally posted by sc281
                        Always better to be an Uncle than a Father. All the fun stuff and none of the expensive stuff.
                        Originally posted by Trick Pony
                        ...from what I've seen on here bcoop knows his shit when it comes to smoking meat.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X