Originally posted by DOHCTR
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Our friends at the U.N. are at it again!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Vertnut View PostJust a halt on manufacturing weapons here in our country...
Originally posted by Vertnut View Post...and/or not allowing importation of those made outside the country.
Originally posted by Vertnut View PostJust tax the piss out of all the gun manufacturers to the point they can't stay in business.
Modern military weapons (select fires/full autos) were banned by Reagan in '86, 2 supreme court rulings say you can have pistols, and they cant take away your hunting rifles and shotguns. What the fuck other gun rights can we lose?Originally posted by lincolnboyAfter watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DOHCTR View PostLOL! Sure, put a multi-billion dollar a year industry out of work. Oh wait, you have to ban ALL guns in the country first somehow. Sounds legit.
George Bush (a republican) did that in 1989.
They have done this. Hell, every gun I want nowadays requires an additional $200 that back in '34 was a shitload of money.
Modern military weapons (select fires/full autos) were banned by Reagan in '86, 2 supreme court rulings say you can have pistols, and they cant take away your hunting rifles and shotguns. What the fuck other gun rights can we lose?
Comment
-
Originally posted by DOHCTR View PostI do not fear an international treaty, nor do I foresee a legitimate outside threat to our ability to defend ourselves with firearms.
Real threats to our current way of life exist outside of our ability to own firearms. I am much more concerned about the dollar being ditched as the world reserve currency for example. That will fuck most people over more than any legislation or treaty pertaining to guns.
The ripple effect of any of these other great economic actions will be worsened by the inability to defend ourselves / each other.
So ultimately, I am concerned that what should be another meaningless piece of parchment, will hold more water than it should, and I'm VERY concerned that as many of our "representatives" are willing to sign off on it. It shows a very clear state of mind differential between many of the populace and the seeming majority of the politicians.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View PostI agree completely that our current course is going to send us into failure mode, which will let the husker-doos up in Washington rush "emergency" legislation (as B.Obama has already been in favor of doing).
The ripple effect of any of these other great economic actions will be worsened by the inability to defend ourselves / each other.
So ultimately, I am concerned that what should be another meaningless piece of parchment, will hold more water than it should, and I'm VERY concerned that as many of our "representatives" are willing to sign off on it. It shows a very clear state of mind differential between many of the populace and the seeming majority of the politicians.
Hell, I am for it now.Originally posted by lincolnboyAfter watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DOHCTR View PostYou know as well as I do that if Obama and the Democrats started shaving that close to the grain then there would be legitimate talks of a large portion of the country leaving the union.
Hell, I am for it now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DOHCTR View PostModern military weapons (select fires/full autos) were banned by Reagan in '86, 2 supreme court rulings say you can have pistols, and they cant take away your hunting rifles and shotguns. What the fuck other gun rights can we lose?
Granted, not 100% the same but to a lot of UN folks this would be completely acceptable behavior to just take our guns. Those countries also had laws/provision for their citizens to have guns.
Also, a lot did not give up their guns either. However, after the amnesty period they are now breaking their local laws - that were influenced by the UN.
In short, there is no good reason to be a part of the treaty. There are bad reasons to do so and I think that's the main point.Originally posted by MR EDDU defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DOHCTR View PostYou know as well as I do that if Obama and the Democrats started shaving that close to the grain then there would be legitimate talks of a large portion of the country leaving the union.
Hell, I am for it now.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ceyko View PostAll of them. I've been in countries where the UN provided amnesty and US/MNF troops went door to door taking weapons or confiscating them if found.
Granted, not 100% the same but to a lot of UN folks this would be completely acceptable behavior to just take our guns. Those countries also had laws/provision for their citizens to have guns.
Also, a lot did not give up their guns either. However, after the amnesty period they are now breaking their local laws - that were influenced by the UN.
In short, there is no good reason to be a part of the treaty. There are bad reasons to do so and I think that's the main point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View PostI'd be very interested in reading an in depth look at how that would go down at this point. My perspective is that unless it was a swift and strong movement on the part of the secessionists, the government would just label it terrorism and use the military to do work. It's not the 1860's, when a bow and arrow wasn't too much of a disadvantage compared to a flintlock.Originally posted by MR EDDU defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.
Comment
Comment