It may be mentioned elsewhere, but I'm a little lazy today. What is the ATF reasoning(whether it makes sense or not) as to why a SBR is so dangerous that it needs additional regulation vs. virtually the same weapon without a stock?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AR-15 "pistol" question
Collapse
X
-
Cause somewhere somebody in the 30s (about the time of Bonnie and Clyde) decided that making a short barrel and stock setup made it more dangerous. How this shit is still in effect is beyond me. I'd give my right nut if it would make that dumb shit go away.
That's also where the 200 dollar tax stamp came from. Which at that time was a significant sum of money.2004 Suzuki DL650
1996 Hy-Tek Hurricane 103
Comment
-
Originally posted by 71chevellejohn View PostIt may be mentioned elsewhere, but I'm a little lazy today. What is the ATF reasoning(whether it makes sense or not) as to why a SBR is so dangerous that it needs additional regulation vs. virtually the same weapon without a stock?
Presumably because a stock would make the weapon more accurate, in that it would be marginally easier to aim it?
Regardless, it is freaking cool to see that fireball in the middle of the day! Shot one yesterday and it was badass...
Comment
-
My brother just sold 2 of these at the gun show in Ft. Worth today. They were a hoot to shoot but nothing I'd want to hunt with. Now, home security???? I dunno if I'd want a .223, brother's gun, going off in the house. Still, a blast to shoot.
One of the guns in the center of the shot below. (10/22, ar "pistol" in .223, ar rifle in .223, respectively)
Originally posted by Taya Kyle, American GunThere comes a time when honest debate, serious diplomatic efforts, and logical arguments have been exhausted and only men and women willing to take up arms against evil will suffice to save the freedom of a nation or continent.
Comment
Comment