Originally posted by GeorgeG.
View Post
Now, that's not to say they cannot terminate your employment for any other reason, or just because they want to as Texas is an at-will employment state. At first glance, Sec. 52.063 seems to favor a business' interests, but I think it favors a CHL holder moreso; it provides incentive to a business to accept the "risk" of weapons on the property, rather than take a mitigated, known loss through a settlement for unlawful termination of employment. Without that section, I absolutely see business' legal departments making a point of recommending the cost of a settlement over accepting the liability should someone go postal and they didn't do due diligence in preventing it through prohibition.
Comment