Originally posted by 03trubluGT
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Snubbies: .38 Specials vs. .357 Magnums
Collapse
X
-
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostThat thread seems to support barrel length has more of an effect than does the speed of the powder.Originally posted by BroncojohnnyHOORAY ME and FUCK YOU!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostThat thread seems to support barrel length has more of an effect than does the speed of the powder.
Even in slower rifle powders, the powder should be completely burned in the first couple of inches. The gasses however continue expanding. there is a theoretical limit to rate of expansion for nitrocellulose of roughly 5000 fps.
The peak pressure point arrives before full burn; this point is extremely important because it must coincide with the swaging of the bullet, which varies depending on cylinders (for revolvers), forcing cone, rifling, taper, bullet crimp, material hardness, etc. A double base propellant varies the peak pressure point considerably because the nitroglycerin has different properties depending on how much pressure it is already under from the nitrocellulose burn.
It is an oldie but a goodie, (and someone still has my copy) but hatcher's notebook is a great source of internal ballistic info.
Comment
-
FYI, in case it helps your testing. Speer has some short barrel data for both 38+p and 357 Mag in their reloading book. They only do that with the lighter Gold Dot bullets but the same bullets and powders are listed with longer barrel lengths as well. You can see the reduction in velocity and that different powders acheive max velocity in the different barrel lengths.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nash B. View PostWell, yeah, but that's not relevant to the discussion we're having. In our discussion, barrel length is the constant (2" or so), powder type is the variable. With the exception of fecmech, everybody agrees that a fast powder will outperform a slow powder in a very short barrel.
I'm not saying that there is a difference, I'm just saying that length weighs more than speed.
I would doubt that one powder would chrono 875 fps and another would chrono 1600 fps out of a 2" barrel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostI'm not saying that there is a difference, I'm just saying that length weighs more than speed.
I would doubt that one powder would chrono 875 fps and another would chrono 1600 fps out of a 2" barrel.
I would really like to try some of this with a short-barreled 460 or 500 S&W. Guess that's another one to add to the list...Originally posted by BroncojohnnyHOORAY ME and FUCK YOU!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View PostCj, I know you wanted to chrono some loads, ill volunteer the alaskan if you want to test these theories"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostI was looking for snubbie for the wife and I came across this little gem at Cabelas and not bad priced either @ $279.00
http://www.cabelas.com/product/Shoot...3Bcat105527880
Comment
Comment