Tweet
Hangover 2 Trailer
Holy fuck I cant wait. This looks as good as the 1st.
-
-
"Is this a PF Changs?" lmfao! Probably won't be as good as the first, but I'll see it in the theater. -
I cant believe they somehow incorporated Chow back into the script. I wanna see how that happened.Comment
-
Haha! That trailer just changed my mind. From the trailer I saw a while back I was wasn't too excited."Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron SwansonComment
-
Looks fucking dumb.Comment
-
Probably won't be as good as the first but I will still see it99 Mustang Project JSTA2V
going from really slow to just alittle slow
2013 Focus ST the daily cruising the 4 bangerComment
-
thats gonna be a fun movie to watchComment
-
LOL. Whats Chow doing here?! He's my +1....
Edit!Last edited by Craizie; 04-03-2011, 03:06 PM.Comment
-
Chow.Comment
-
Originally posted by David View Post
And here I thought they were aiming for the "Life is Beautiful" crowd...Comment
-
Meh. I'm probably also one of the few that thought the first one sucked also.Originally posted by talisman View PostComment
-
Can't wait!!Comment
-
haha
Like many, we were a bit concerned about the first extended trailer for this summer's "The Hangover Part II," not because it didn't look funny, exactly, but because it looked so much like the original film that the mystery -- one of the best parts of the first film -- would be gone. Director Todd Phillips must have seen some of the reaction, because he made sure everyone knew that the trailer was too PG-13 to show what the movie was really about.
But it must not have been PG-13 enough. The MPAA and Warner Bros have demanded that the trailer be pulled from all theaters.
Slashfilm obtained a copy of the letter sent to theaters, which states (emphasis theirs):
"Warner Bros. and the M.P.A.A. have instructed all theatres to remove The Hangover Part II trailer #2 from Source Code and any other placements. These #2 trailers need to be DELETED FROM YOUR SERVER." adding: "We greatly appreciate your immediate cooperation on this matter."
So, what's the issue? The trailer doesn't strike us as particularly offensive, but we do not have delicate sensibilities. Also: Why "Source Code," specifically? Did Summit just want the film as far away from "Hangover" as possible? Why? Is it the coarse language? Was Jake Gyllenhaal offended? (You do not want to offend Jake Gyllenhaal.) We are so full of questions. We asked the MPAA for comment, and they referred us to Warner Bros, who, of course, aren't commenting on the matter. (A Warner Bros rep hasn't responded to our request for comment.)
UPDATE: Warner Bros issued a statement to The Hollywood Reporter regarding the trailer's hasty removal from theaters. Apparently monkeys performing "a simulated sex act" don't meet the MPAA's appropriateness standards: "In our haste to meet the placement schedule for this trailer, we failed to properly vet the final version with the MPAA. We acted immediately to correct the mistake and removed the trailer from screens."
The only other time we can recall something like this happening was when the "Paranormal Activity 2" trailer was pulled from theaters after "numerous complaints" that the 72-second preview was too scary for the general public. Of course, many suspected that was a stunt intended to generate press for the film -- and this latest development certainly hasn't stopped people from talking about "The Hangover Part II."Comment
-
Leaving to go see it. Hoping it will be fucking hilarious.Comment
-
Waiting for the review....Originally posted by aCid View Post"Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul HarveyComment
Comment