The fact their company's primary revenue is from advertising gives them a huge edge over competitors like Microsoft. They can give it away or undercut everyone and still make their bottom line. Like MS or not, they were selling a product still, Google isn't really selling anything to consumers. This isn't really the same thing that Microsoft faced with their antitrust lawsuits.
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Microsoft was giving away Internet Explorer and killing the profitability of other browsers. Google is giving away Android and killing the profitability of other mobile OSes.
Microsoft was giving away Internet Explorer and killing the profitability of other browsers. Google is giving away Android and killing the profitability of other mobile OSes.
Okay, I thought the MS decision(s) were stupid and I think this one is as well. It's not like MS stopped the various browser back then from being installed - they just gave you one to use. Since theirs sucked there was one or two bad ass ones way back when (one for sure is dead, but I can't remember it's name) and most people just installed it. Hell, Netscape was one I think that was great for a year or two.
Either way, these things should not be chosen for us in court. It's a terrible move no matter who is doing it.
Originally posted by MR EDD
U defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.
Gates and Co crying? You do realize that Apple, MSFT, and Google currently have one giant circle-jerk of litigation going currently, have had it going for several years now, and will continue to have it into the foreseeable future? On IP and anti-trust, if you're not litigating, you're falling behind.
Comment