Originally posted by BajaBob
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Apple is sacrificing quality
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tx Redneck View PostThat's innovation.
Saved and Texan by the Grace of God, Redneck by choice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jose View PostI can understand the battery not being user swappable, cell phone manufacturers are doing that as well to squeeze the most of the space available but not allowing the user to swap out memory and HD's makes it seem like a profit move to force the customer to buy the upgrades from the manufacturer. Not cool.Tera 4:1 + 4.88's = Slowest rig on here
Baja-Bob.com
Comment
-
Apple, me la pela!
I never bought into the hype, before I bought my DroidX I played around with the Apple phone and the one constant was the battery going dead after about an hour of playing a game or being on the internetz. That and if you wanted more memory you had to pay more. I went ahead and bought a X and have been very happy. I get tired of bitches wanting to hook up to my laptop or car to charge their shit!
The laptops are very expensive too and I almost bought a AIR but decided to buy a Dell, for the same money (cheaper actually) I got hooked up with touch screen, Core i7, lots of memory and a huge hardrive, more than I will ever need.Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostTake the Apple Macintosh for example. They refused to share their architecture with anyone. IBM didn't have any problem sharing the x86 architecture and the PC annihilated the Mac.Originally posted by Taya Kyle, American GunThere comes a time when honest debate, serious diplomatic efforts, and logical arguments have been exhausted and only men and women willing to take up arms against evil will suffice to save the freedom of a nation or continent.
Comment
-
I think you guys are overestimating googles abilities. They have a lot of failures in the last 5 years and content providing is how companies in the future will make money. Google is one of their main competitors.
Apple is making a smart move to futureproof its assets, and they will probably continue to do some innovated shit BEFORE the competition.
Comment
-
i am really passionate about cell phones and companies that i dont work for!!!
www.hppmotorsports.com
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darren M View PostPicking nits but.... That's not what really happened. IBM didn't think the Personal Computer was really going to take off and therefore gave the plans away. Couple that w/ "right place/right time" for Bill Gates and a cheap OS+Hardware = lucky success. IBM didn't make "the right" move, it got very lucky. Or unlucky, depending upon your point of view."When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
-
Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostYou're right, I forgot about that portion. But, the facts still remain in regards to open platforms and proprietary.
It may sound anti linux of me, but I support their proprietary ideas and concepts to a degree, Linux ( and googles ) failing sometimes is how widesread and open source an item is. It is so much cleaner whenever there is one entity controlling all aspects of some items, specifically in the consumer market.
Just because you come up with the idea first does not mean it'll be implemented properly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by abecx View PostApple used to be open hardware back in the mid 90's, you were allowed to clone their PC's, but it flopped and caused a lot of problems ( particular from the support side ), as well it started eating into their profit because people were selling better, faster, stronger systems for cheaper.
It may sound anti linux of me, but I support their proprietary ideas and concepts to a degree, Linux ( and googles ) failing sometimes is how widesread and open source an item is. It is so much cleaner whenever there is one entity controlling all aspects of some items, specifically in the consumer market.
Just because you come up with the idea first does not mean it'll be implemented properly.
There are advantages or a proprietary system of course. I agree with that. However, there are disadvantages also. I find Android to be better suited for what I like. Same for PC's over macs."When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
-
Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostThere are advantages or a proprietary system of course. I agree with that. However, there are disadvantages also. I find Android to be better suited for what I like. Same for PC's over macs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by abecx View PostI totally agree and feel the same, but we are power users for the most part. I love that I can give an Apple device to someone that doesn't understand what the difference between a CPU and Memory is and they have no problems mastering it. The user experience is so much cleaner for everyday users and that is how it should be.
Saved and Texan by the Grace of God, Redneck by choice.
Comment
Comment