Mw3

[Downs]

PS3. In bf you have so much more time to think things out, the game pace is much slower. Jumping into tanks n such was fun at first, but got old. I like the pure man vs man combat of cod. I can see why some people prefer bf. Imo though, cod is quite a bit more challenging and more realistic.

Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk

IMO BF3 encourages teamplay much more than COD. I play both but enjoy BF3 more as it encourages you to think about what you do. If you play against a group that actually works as a team and you are with a random group you are going to get your ass handed to you.

I do find on BF3 I get into more games where people will actually work towards the goal of winning where on COD even when doing objective based games people only seem interested in kills more often than not.

[Gtracer]

You know, thinking strategy; if someone or at least two people on your team are going for kills only, then this will help you achieve the objective. I see it as, if you force them to keep spawning then it makes it harder for them to hold a spot in an objective based lobby. If you have 6 guys, at least 3 attacking a spot and at most 3 guys going for kills, then you will dominate.

[BttleFedC10]

IMO BF3 encourages teamplay much more than COD. I play both but enjoy BF3 more as it encourages you to think about what you do. If you play against a group that actually works as a team and you are with a random group you are going to get your ass handed to you.

I do find on BF3 I get into more games where people will actually work towards the goal of winning where on COD even when doing objective based games people only seem interested in kills more often than not.

Thats what i hate the most about COD I play alot of S&D and usually when its our turn to plant the bomb noone grabs or someone grabs and they just run around looking for people instead of planting the bomb or they camp while were suppose to plant.

Its like if you wanna go for kills then go play team deathmatch or domination or something.