Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jay Leno's 1963 Chrysler Turbine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jay Leno's 1963 Chrysler Turbine

    he is a lucky bastard


    video

  • #2
    He does have some nice cars, but that is one ugly Mo#%#%F&^%er.
    Whos your Daddy?

    Comment


    • #3
      but that car is seriously rare! i bet he gave Chrysler some serious coin for it

      Comment


      • #4
        Amazing. Never knew it existed. But a jet engine car is something I have always wondered about. I always wondered if you could somehow squeeze more power and fuel economy out of a jet engine car just because of the sheer capability of the turbine engine. Like if you toned it down enough to be in a car, maybe it would do better than a piston engine.

        Comment


        • #5
          turbines are not fuel efficient
          http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

          Comment


          • #6
            That one got 19mpg highway. Not too shabby for 1963.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Cooter View Post
              turbines are not fuel efficient
              yea that was a main concern in 1964

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kingjason View Post
                He does have some nice cars, but that is one ugly Mo#%#%F&^%er.
                Ugly???

                While I'll admit the front end treatment is a little too conservative (for that car), the total design package is beautiful!

                What I would give to own that car.

                Great post Scootro.


                David

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
                  Amazing. Never knew it existed. But a jet engine car is something I have always wondered about. I always wondered if you could somehow squeeze more power and fuel economy out of a jet engine car just because of the sheer capability of the turbine engine. Like if you toned it down enough to be in a car, maybe it would do better than a piston engine.
                  Originally posted by Cooter View Post
                  turbines are not fuel efficient
                  Originally posted by scootro View Post
                  yea that was a main concern in 1964
                  orale?
                  http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I read "Chrysler's Turbine Car" recently. Interesting read on the entire turbine program from beginning to end.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X